Difference between revisions of "Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring"
From Maths
m (Moving large blocks of rubric into their own subpages) |
m (Saving work) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==What I want to show== | ==What I want to show== | ||
* {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} for a system of sets, {{M|S}}. | * {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} for a system of sets, {{M|S}}. | ||
− | == | + | Both are hereditary, and both are {{sigma|rings}}. |
− | + | ==Showing {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} (or not)== | |
+ | |||
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts|Facts]]== | ==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts|Facts]]== | ||
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts}} | {{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts}} | ||
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts|Proof of facts]]== | ==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts|Proof of facts]]== | ||
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts}} | {{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts}} | ||
+ | |||
{{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}} | {{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}} |
Revision as of 02:25, 8 April 2016
I'm writing down some "facts" so I don't keep redoing them on paper.
What I want to show
- H(σR(S))=σR(H(S)) for a system of sets, S.
Both are hereditary, and both are σ-rings.
Showing H(σR(S))=σR(H(S)) (or not)
Facts
- An hereditary system is a sigma-ring ⟺ it is closed under countable unions.
- Thus σR(H(S)) is just H(S) with the additional property:
- ∀(An)∞n=1⊆H(S)[⋃∞n=1An∈σR(H(S))]
- Thus σR(H(S)) is just H(S) with the additional property:
- H(R) is a σ-ring (for any σ-ring, R)
- This means σR(H(R))=H(R)
- It also means H(σR(S)) is a σ-ring
- σR(H(S)) is just H(S) closed under countable union.
- σR(H(S)) is hereditary
Proof of facts
- An hereditary system is a sigma-ring ⟺ it is closed under countable unions.
- Hereditary system is a sigma-ring ⟹ closed under countable unions
- It is a σ-ring which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
- A hereditary system closed under countable union ⟹ it is a σ-ring
- closed under set-subtraction
- Let A,B∈H for some hereditary system H. Then:
- A−B⊆A, but H contains A and therefore all subsets of A
- Thus H is closed under set subtraction.
- Let A,B∈H for some hereditary system H. Then:
- Closed under countable union is given.
- closed under set-subtraction
- Hereditary system is a sigma-ring ⟹ closed under countable unions
- H(R) is a σ-ring (for any σ-ring, R)
- It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
- Closed under countable union
- Let (An)∞n=1⊆H(R) (we need to show ⟹⋃∞n=1An∈H(R))
- This means, for each An∈H(R) there is a Bn∈R with An⊆Bn thus:
- ∀(An)∞n=1⊆H(R)∃(Bn)∞n=1⊆R∀i∈N[Ai⊆Bi]
- However R is a σ-ring, thus:
- Define B:=⋃∞n=1Bn, notice B∈R
- But a union of subsets is a subset of the union, thus:
- ⋃∞n=1An⊆⋃∞n=1Bn:=B, thus
- ⋃∞n=1An⊆B
- BUT H(R) contains all subsets of all things in R, thus contains all subsets of B.
- ⋃∞n=1An⊆⋃∞n=1Bn:=B, thus
- Thus ⋃∞n=1An∈H(R)
- This means, for each An∈H(R) there is a Bn∈R with An⊆Bn thus:
- Thus H(R) is closed under countable union.
- Let (An)∞n=1⊆H(R) (we need to show ⟹⋃∞n=1An∈H(R))
- σR(H(S)) is just H(S) closed under countable union.
- Follows from fact 1. As H(S) is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing H(S) is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
- σR(H(S)) is hereditary
- Let A∈σR(H(S)) be given. We want to show that ∀B∈P(A) that B∈σR(H(S)).
- If A∈H(S), then ∀B∈P(A)[B∈H(S) but B∈H(S)⟹B∈σR(H(S))
- We're done in this case.
- OTHERWISE: ∃(An)∞n=1⊆H(S)[⋃∞n=1An=A] (by fact 3)
- Let B∈P(A) be given.
- Define a new sequence, (Bn)∞n=1⊆H(S), where Bi:=Ai∩B
- Ai∩B is a subset of Ai and Ai∈H(S), as "hereditary" means "contains all subsets of" Ai∩B⊆Ai thus Ai∩B:=Bi∈H(S)
- Clearly B=⋃∞n=1Bn (as B⊆A and A=⋃∞n=1An)
- As σR(H(S) contains all countable unions of things in H(S) we know:
- ⋃∞n=1Bn=B∈σR(H(S))
- Define a new sequence, (Bn)∞n=1⊆H(S), where Bi:=Ai∩B
- We have shown B∈σR(H(S))
- Let B∈P(A) be given.
- If A∈H(S), then ∀B∈P(A)[B∈H(S) but B∈H(S)⟹B∈σR(H(S))
- We have completed the proof
- Let A∈σR(H(S)) be given. We want to show that ∀B∈P(A) that B∈σR(H(S)).
TODO: It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".