Difference between revisions of "Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Moving large blocks of rubric into their own subpages)
m (Saving work)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
==What I want to show==
 
==What I want to show==
 
* {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} for a system of sets, {{M|S}}.
 
* {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} for a system of sets, {{M|S}}.
==Ideas==
+
Both are hereditary, and both are {{sigma|rings}}.
* Maybe just try showing {{M|\subseteq}} for each side on paper
+
==Showing {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} (or not)==
 +
 
 
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts|Facts]]==
 
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts|Facts]]==
 
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts}}
 
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts}}
 
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts|Proof of facts]]==
 
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts|Proof of facts]]==
 
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts}}
 
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts}}
 +
  
  
 
{{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}}
 
{{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}}

Revision as of 02:25, 8 April 2016

I'm writing down some "facts" so I don't keep redoing them on paper.

What I want to show

  • H(σR(S))=σR(H(S)) for a system of sets, S.

Both are hereditary, and both are σ-rings.

Showing H(σR(S))=σR(H(S)) (or not)

Facts

  1. An hereditary system is a sigma-ring it is closed under countable unions.
    • Thus σR(H(S)) is just H(S) with the additional property:
      • (An)n=1H(S)[n=1AnσR(H(S))]
  2. H(R) is a σ-ring (for any σ-ring, R)
    • This means σR(H(R))=H(R)
    • It also means H(σR(S)) is a σ-ring
  3. σR(H(S)) is just H(S) closed under countable union.
  4. σR(H(S)) is hereditary

Proof of facts

  1. An hereditary system is a sigma-ring it is closed under countable unions.
    1. Hereditary system is a sigma-ring closed under countable unions
      • It is a σ-ring which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
    2. A hereditary system closed under countable union it is a σ-ring
      1. closed under set-subtraction
        • Let A,BH for some hereditary system H. Then:
          • ABA, but H contains A and therefore all subsets of A
        • Thus H is closed under set subtraction.
      2. Closed under countable union is given.
  2. H(R) is a σ-ring (for any σ-ring, R)
    1. It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
    2. Closed under countable union
      • Let (An)n=1H(R) (we need to show n=1AnH(R))
        • This means, for each AnH(R) there is a BnR with AnBn thus:
          • (An)n=1H(R)(Bn)n=1RiN[AiBi]
        • However R is a σ-ring, thus:
          • Define B:=n=1Bn, notice BR
        • But a union of subsets is a subset of the union, thus:
          • n=1Ann=1Bn:=B, thus
            • n=1AnB
          • BUT H(R) contains all subsets of all things in R, thus contains all subsets of B.
        • Thus n=1AnH(R)
      • Thus H(R) is closed under countable union.
  3. σR(H(S)) is just H(S) closed under countable union.
    • Follows from fact 1. As H(S) is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing H(S) is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
  4. σR(H(S)) is hereditary
    • Let AσR(H(S)) be given. We want to show that BP(A) that BσR(H(S)).
      1. If AH(S), then BP(A)[BH(S) but BH(S)BσR(H(S))
        • We're done in this case.
      2. OTHERWISE: (An)n=1H(S)[n=1An=A] (by fact 3)
        • Let BP(A) be given.
          • Define a new sequence, (Bn)n=1H(S), where Bi:=AiB
            • AiB is a subset of Ai and AiH(S), as "hereditary" means "contains all subsets of" AiBAi thus AiB:=BiH(S)
          • Clearly B=n=1Bn (as BA and A=n=1An)
          • As σR(H(S) contains all countable unions of things in H(S) we know:
            • n=1Bn=BσR(H(S))
        • We have shown BσR(H(S))
    • We have completed the proof




TODO: It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".