Difference between revisions of "Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Saving work.)
 
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
==What I want to show==
 
==What I want to show==
 
* {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} for a system of sets, {{M|S}}.
 
* {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} for a system of sets, {{M|S}}.
==Ideas==
+
Both are hereditary, and both are {{sigma|rings}}.
* Maybe just try showing {{M|\subseteq}} for each side on paper
+
==Facts==
+
# An hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\iff}} it is closed under countable unions.
+
#* Thus {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} with the additional property:
+
#** {{M|1=\forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))\right]}}<!--
+
  
FACT 2
+
{{Note|The result is true!}}
-->
+
# {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} is a {{sigma|ring}} (for any {{sigma|ring}}, {{M|\mathcal{R} }})
+
#* This means {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))=\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}}
+
#* It also means {{M|\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}} is a {{sigma|ring}}<!--
+
  
FACT 3
+
{{Todo|Make a theorem out of this!}}
-->
+
==Showing {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}==
# {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} closed under countable union.
+
Which way first?
==Proof of facts==
+
==={{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))\subseteq\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}===
# An hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\iff}} it is closed under countable unions.
+
* Let {{M|A\in\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}} be given. Then:
## Hereditary system is a sigma-ring {{M|\implies}} closed under countable unions
+
** {{M|1=\exists B\in\sigma_R(S)[A\in\mathcal{P}(B)]}}
##* It ''is a {{sigma|ring}}'' which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
+
*** Notice that {{M|S\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)}} thus:
## A hereditary system closed under countable union {{M|\implies}} it is a {{sigma|ring}}
+
**** {{M|\sigma_R(S)\subseteq\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}
### closed under set-subtraction
+
*** So {{M|B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}
###* Let {{M|A,B\in\mathcal{H} }} for some hereditary system {{M|\mathcal{H} }}. Then:
+
** As {{M|\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is hereditary {{M|\forall C\in\mathcal{P}(B)[C\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}
###** {{M|A-B\subseteq A}}, but {{M|\mathcal{H} }} contains {{M|A}} and therefore all subsets of {{M|A}}
+
*** So {{M|A\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}
###* Thus {{M|\mathcal{H} }} is closed under set subtraction.
+
* This shows {{M|1=\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))\subseteq\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}
### Closed under countable union is given.<!--
+
==={{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}}===
 +
* Let {{M|A\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}}, then, either (by fact 3):
 +
*# {{M|A\in\mathcal{H}(S)}}
 +
*#* This means: {{M|1=\exists B\in S[A\in\mathcal{P}(B)]}} (also said as: {{M|\exists B\in S[A\subseteq B]}})
 +
*#* But {{M|S\subseteq\sigma_R(S)}}, thus:
 +
*#** {{M|B\in\sigma_R(S)}}
 +
*#* But {{M|\sigma_R(S)\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}} thus:
 +
*#** {{M|B\in\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}}
 +
*#* As {{M|\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}} is hereditary, all subsets of {{M|B}} are in it.
 +
*#* As {{M|A\in\mathcal{P}(B)}} we see {{M|A\in\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}} - this completes this half of the proof.
 +
*# {{MSeq|A_n|in=\mathcal{H}(S)|pre=\exists|post=[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n=A]}}
 +
*#* Using part 1 we see that: {{M|1=\forall i\in\mathbb{N}[A_i\in\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))]}}
 +
*#** But we know {{M|\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}} is a {{sigma|ring}}, thus closed under countable union
 +
*#* Thus {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}}
 +
*#** But {{M|1=A:=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n}} so
 +
*#* {{M|A\in\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}}
 +
* We have shown that in either case, {{M|A\in\mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S))}}
 +
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts|Facts]]==
 +
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Facts}}
 +
==[[Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts|Proof of facts]]==
 +
{{:Notes:Hereditary sigma-ring/Proof of facts}}
  
END OF PROOF OF FACT 1
 
  
-->
 
# {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} is a {{sigma|ring}} (for any {{sigma|ring}}, {{M|\mathcal{R} }})
 
## It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
 
## Closed under countable union
 
##* Let {{M|1=(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} (we need to show {{M|1=\implies\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) }})
 
##** This means, for each {{M|A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} there is a {{M|B_n\in\mathcal{R} }} with {{M|A_n\subseteq B_n}} thus:
 
##*** {{M|1=\forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})\exists(B_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\forall i\in\mathbb{N}[A_i\subseteq B_i]}}
 
##** However {{M|\mathcal{R} }} is a {{sigma|ring}}, thus:
 
##*** Define {{M|1=B:=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n}}, notice {{M|B\in\mathcal{R} }}
 
##** But a [[union of subsets is a subset of the union]], thus:
 
##*** {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n:=B}}, thus
 
##**** {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq B}}
 
##*** BUT {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} contains all subsets of all things in {{M|\mathcal{R} }}, thus contains all subsets of {{M|B}}.
 
##** Thus {{M|1=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}}
 
##* Thus {{M|\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})}} is closed under countable union.<!--
 
  
END OF PROOF OF FACT 2
+
 
-->
+
 
# {{M|1=\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))}} is just {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} closed under countable union.
+
 
#* Follows from fact 1. As {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing {{M|\mathcal{H}(S)}} is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
+
{{Todo|It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".}}
 +
 
 +
{{Notes|Measure Theory}}[[Category:Finished notes]]

Latest revision as of 19:26, 24 May 2016

I'm writing down some "facts" so I don't keep redoing them on paper.

What I want to show

  • H(σR(S))=σR(H(S)) for a system of sets, S.

Both are hereditary, and both are σ-rings.

The result is true!



TODO: Make a theorem out of this!


Showing H(σR(S))=σR(H(S))

Which way first?

H(σR(S))σR(H(S))

  • Let AH(σR(S)) be given. Then:
    • BσR(S)[AP(B)]
      • Notice that SH(S) thus:
        • σR(S)σR(H(S))
      • So BσR(H(S))
    • As σR(H(S)) is hereditary CP(B)[CσR(H(S))
      • So AσR(H(S))
  • This shows H(σR(S))σR(H(S))

σR(H(S))H(σR(S))

  • Let AσR(H(S)), then, either (by fact 3):
    1. AH(S)
      • This means: BS[AP(B)] (also said as: BS[AB])
      • But SσR(S), thus:
        • BσR(S)
      • But σR(S)H(σR(S)) thus:
        • BH(σR(S))
      • As H(σR(S)) is hereditary, all subsets of B are in it.
      • As AP(B) we see AH(σR(S)) - this completes this half of the proof.
    2. (An)n=1H(S)[n=1An=A]
      • Using part 1 we see that: iN[AiH(σR(S))]
        • But we know H(σR(S)) is a σ-ring, thus closed under countable union
      • Thus n=1AnH(σR(S))
        • But A:=n=1An so
      • AH(σR(S))
  • We have shown that in either case, AH(σR(S))

Facts

  1. An hereditary system is a sigma-ring \iff it is closed under countable unions.
    • Thus \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) with the additional property:
      • \forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))\right]
  2. \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is a \sigma-ring (for any \sigma-ring, \mathcal{R} )
    • This means \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))=\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})
    • It also means \mathcal{H}(\sigma_R(S)) is a \sigma-ring
  3. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) closed under countable union.
  4. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is hereditary

Proof of facts

  1. An hereditary system is a sigma-ring \iff it is closed under countable unions.
    1. Hereditary system is a sigma-ring \implies closed under countable unions
      • It is a \sigma-ring which means it is closed under countable unions. Done
    2. A hereditary system closed under countable union \implies it is a \sigma-ring
      1. closed under set-subtraction
        • Let A,B\in\mathcal{H} for some hereditary system \mathcal{H} . Then:
          • A-B\subseteq A, but \mathcal{H} contains A and therefore all subsets of A
        • Thus \mathcal{H} is closed under set subtraction.
      2. Closed under countable union is given.
  2. \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is a \sigma-ring (for any \sigma-ring, \mathcal{R} )
    1. It is already shown that a hereditary system is closed under set subtraction, only remains to be shown closed under countable union
    2. Closed under countable union
      • Let (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) (we need to show \implies\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}))
        • This means, for each A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) there is a B_n\in\mathcal{R} with A_n\subseteq B_n thus:
          • \forall(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})\exists(B_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{R}\forall i\in\mathbb{N}[A_i\subseteq B_i]
        • However \mathcal{R} is a \sigma-ring, thus:
          • Define B:=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n, notice B\in\mathcal{R}
        • But a union of subsets is a subset of the union, thus:
          • \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n:=B, thus
            • \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\subseteq B
          • BUT \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) contains all subsets of all things in \mathcal{R} , thus contains all subsets of B.
        • Thus \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R})
      • Thus \mathcal{H}(\mathcal{R}) is closed under countable union.
  3. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is just \mathcal{H}(S) closed under countable union.
    • Follows from fact 1. As \mathcal{H}(S) is an hereditary system, the sigma-ring generated by it (the smallest sigma ring containing \mathcal{H}(S) is just the set with whatever is needed to close it under the operators)
  4. \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) is hereditary
    • Let A\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)) be given. We want to show that \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A) that B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S)).
      1. If A\in\mathcal{H}(S), then \forall B\in\mathcal{P}(A)[B\in\mathcal{H}(S) but B\in\mathcal{H}(S)\implies B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
        • We're done in this case.
      2. OTHERWISE: \exists(A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{H}(S)\left[\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n=A\right] (by fact 3)
        • Let B\in\mathcal{P}(A) be given.
          • Define a new sequence, ({ B_n })_{ n = 1 }^{ \infty }\subseteq \mathcal{H}(S) , where B_i:=A_i\cap B
            • A_i\cap B is a subset of A_i and A_i\in\mathcal{H}(S), as "hereditary" means "contains all subsets of" A_i\cap B\subseteq A_i thus A_i\cap B:=B_i\in\mathcal{H}(S)
          • Clearly B=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n (as B\subseteq A and A=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n)
          • As \sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S) contains all countable unions of things in \mathcal{H}(S) we know:
            • \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n=B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
        • We have shown B\in\sigma_R(\mathcal{H}(S))
    • We have completed the proof





TODO: It seems, "hereditary sigma-ring" is the same as "sigma-ideal".