Difference between revisions of "Partial ordering"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with ":: '''Note to reader: ''' this page defines {{M|\sqsubseteq}} as the partial ordering under study, this is to try and make the concept distinct from {{M|\le}}, which the reade...")
 
m (References)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
Given a [[relation]], {{M|\sqsubseteq}} in {{M|X}} (mathematically: {{M|\sqsubseteq\subseteq X\times X}}<ref group="Note">Here {{M|\sqsubseteq}} is the name of the relation, so {{M|(x,y)\in \sqsubseteq}} means {{M|x\sqsubseteq y}} - as usual for [[relation|relations]]</ref>) we say {{M|\sqsubseteq}} is a ''partial order''{{rAPIKM}} if:
+
Given a [[relation]], {{M|\sqsubseteq}} in {{M|X}} (mathematically: {{M|\sqsubseteq\subseteq X\times X}}<ref group="Note">Here {{M|\sqsubseteq}} is the name of the relation, so {{M|(x,y)\in \sqsubseteq}} means {{M|x\sqsubseteq y}} - as usual for [[relation|relations]]</ref>) we say {{M|\sqsubseteq}} is a ''partial order''{{rAPIKM}}{{rSTTJ}}{{rRAAAHS}} if:
 
* The relation {{M|\sqsubseteq}} is all 3 of the following:
 
* The relation {{M|\sqsubseteq}} is all 3 of the following:
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
Line 15: Line 15:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! 2
 
! 2
| [[Relation#Types_of_relation|Identitive]] or [[Relation#Types_of_relation|Antisymmetric]]
+
| [[Relation#Types_of_relation|Identitive]] ({{AKA}}: [[Relation#Types_of_relation|antisymmetric]])
 
| {{M|1=\forall x,y\in X[((x,y)\in\sqsubseteq\wedge(y,x)\in\sqsubseteq)\implies (x=y)]}} or equivalently<br/>
 
| {{M|1=\forall x,y\in X[((x,y)\in\sqsubseteq\wedge(y,x)\in\sqsubseteq)\implies (x=y)]}} or equivalently<br/>
 
{{M|1=\forall x,y\in X[(x\sqsubseteq y\wedge y\sqsubseteq x)\implies(x=y)]}}
 
{{M|1=\forall x,y\in X[(x\sqsubseteq y\wedge y\sqsubseteq x)\implies(x=y)]}}
Line 26: Line 26:
 
* '''Note:''' {{M|\le}}, {{M|\preceq}} or {{M|\subseteq}}<ref group="Warning">I avoid using {{M|\subseteq}} for anything other than denoting [[subset|subsets]], the relation and the set it relates on will go together, so you'll already be using {{M|\subseteq}} to mean subset</ref> are all commonly used for partial relations too.
 
* '''Note:''' {{M|\le}}, {{M|\preceq}} or {{M|\subseteq}}<ref group="Warning">I avoid using {{M|\subseteq}} for anything other than denoting [[subset|subsets]], the relation and the set it relates on will go together, so you'll already be using {{M|\subseteq}} to mean subset</ref> are all commonly used for partial relations too.
 
** The corresponding [[strict partial ordering|strict partial orderings]] are {{M|<}}, {{M|\prec}} and {{M|\subset}}
 
** The corresponding [[strict partial ordering|strict partial orderings]] are {{M|<}}, {{M|\prec}} and {{M|\subset}}
 +
===Alternative definition===
 +
Alternatively, a ''partial order'' is simply a [[preorder]] that is also ''[[Relation#Types_of_relation|anti-symmetric]]'' ({{AKA}} ''[[Relation#Types_of_relation|Identitive]]''), that is to say{{rAITCTHS2010}}:
 +
* Given a preorder in {{M|X}}, so a {{M|\preceq}} such that {{M|\preceq\subseteq X\times X}}, then {{M|\preceq}} is also a ''partial order'' if:
 +
* {{M|1=\forall x,y\in X[((x,y)\in\preceq\wedge(y,x)\in\preceq)\implies (x=y)]}} or equivalently
 +
** {{M|1=\forall x,y\in X[(x\preceq y\wedge y\preceq x)\implies(x=y)]}}
 +
==Terminology==
 +
A tuple consisting of a set {{M|X}} and a partial order {{M|\sqsubseteq}} in {{M|X}} is called a [[poset]]<ref name="AITCTHS2010"/>, then we may say that:
 +
* {{M|(X,\sqsubseteq)}} is a ''poset''.
 +
==Notation==
 +
Be careful, as {{M|\preceq}}, {{M|\le}} and {{M|\sqsubseteq}} are all used to denote both partial and preorders, so always be clear which one you mean at the point of definition. That is to say write:
 +
* Let {{M|(X,\preceq)}} be a partial ordering in {{M|X}}. Or
 +
* Given any {{M|\preceq}} that is a partial order of {{M|X}}
 +
So forth
 
==Induced [[strict partial ordering]]==
 
==Induced [[strict partial ordering]]==
 
Here, let {{M|\preceq}} be a ''partial ordering'' as defined above, then the relation, {{M|\prec}} defined by:
 
Here, let {{M|\preceq}} be a ''partial ordering'' as defined above, then the relation, {{M|\prec}} defined by:
Line 34: Line 47:
 
In fact there is a 1:1 correspondence between partial and strict partial orderings, this is why the term "partial ordering" is used so casually, as given a strict you have a partial, given a partial you have a strict.
 
In fact there is a 1:1 correspondence between partial and strict partial orderings, this is why the term "partial ordering" is used so casually, as given a strict you have a partial, given a partial you have a strict.
 
* See [[Overview of partial orders]] for more information  
 
* See [[Overview of partial orders]] for more information  
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[Poset]] - the term a tuple consisting of a set equipped with a partial order
 +
* [[Preorder]] - like a partial order except it need not be ''anti-symmetric'' ({{AKA}} ''identitive'')
 +
** [[Preset]] (is to preorder as poset is to partial order) - a tuple consisting of a set and a pre-order on it.
 +
* [[Strict partial order]] - which induces and is induced by the same ''partial order'', thus an equivalent statement to a partial order
 +
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
<references group="Note"/>
 
<references group="Note"/>
Line 40: Line 59:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
{{Definition|Set Theory|Abstract Algebra}}
+
{{Order theory navbox|plain}}
 +
{{Definition|Set Theory|Abstract Algebra|Order Theory}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 20 February 2016

Note to reader: this page defines as the partial ordering under study, this is to try and make the concept distinct from , which the reader should have been familiar with from a young age (and thus can taint initial study)

Definition

Given a relation, in X (mathematically: ⊑⊆X×X[Note 1]) we say is a partial order[1][2][3] if:

  • The relation is all 3 of the following:
Name Definition
1 Reflexive xX[(x,x)∈⊑] or equivalently
xX[xx]
2 Identitive (AKA: antisymmetric) x,yX[((x,y)∈⊑(y,x)∈⊑)(x=y)] or equivalently

x,yX[(xyyx)(x=y)]

3 Transitive x,y,zX[((x,y)∈⊑(y,z)∈⊑)(x,z)∈⊑] or equivalently

x,y,zX[(xyyz)(xz)]

  • Note: , or [Warning 1] are all commonly used for partial relations too.

Alternative definition

Alternatively, a partial order is simply a preorder that is also anti-symmetric (AKA Identitive), that is to say[4]:

  • Given a preorder in X, so a such that ⪯⊆X×X, then is also a partial order if:
  • x,yX[((x,y)∈⪯(y,x)∈⪯)(x=y)] or equivalently
    • x,yX[(xyyx)(x=y)]

Terminology

A tuple consisting of a set X and a partial order in X is called a poset[4], then we may say that:

  • (X,) is a poset.

Notation

Be careful, as , and are all used to denote both partial and preorders, so always be clear which one you mean at the point of definition. That is to say write:

  • Let (X,) be a partial ordering in X. Or
  • Given any that is a partial order of X

So forth

Induced strict partial ordering

Here, let be a partial ordering as defined above, then the relation, defined by:

  • (x,y)∈≺[xyxy]

is a strict partial ordering

  • Note: every strict partial ordering induces a partial ordering, given a strict partial ordering, <, we can define a relation as:
    • xy[x=yx<y] or equivalently (in relational form): (x,y)∈≤[x=y(x,y)∈<]

In fact there is a 1:1 correspondence between partial and strict partial orderings, this is why the term "partial ordering" is used so casually, as given a strict you have a partial, given a partial you have a strict.

See also

  • Poset - the term a tuple consisting of a set equipped with a partial order
  • Preorder - like a partial order except it need not be anti-symmetric (AKA identitive)
    • Preset (is to preorder as poset is to partial order) - a tuple consisting of a set and a pre-order on it.
  • Strict partial order - which induces and is induced by the same partial order, thus an equivalent statement to a partial order

Notes

  1. Jump up Here is the name of the relation, so (x,y)∈⊑ means xy - as usual for relations

Warnings

  1. Jump up I avoid using for anything other than denoting subsets, the relation and the set it relates on will go together, so you'll already be using to mean subset

References

  1. Jump up Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin
  2. Jump up Set Theory - Thomas Jech - Third millennium edition, revised and expanded
  3. Jump up Real and Abstract Analysis - Edwin Hewitt & Karl Stromberg
  4. Jump up to: 4.0 4.1 An Introduction to Category Theory - Harold Simmons - 1st September 2010 edition