Difference between revisions of "Covariant functor"
From Maths
m |
m (→Discussion) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{:Covariant functor/Definition}} | {{:Covariant functor/Definition}} | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
+ | Given | ||
+ | * 3 objects, {{M|X}}, {{M|Y}} and {{M|Z}} in a [[category]] {{M|\mathscr{C} }} | ||
+ | * a (covariant) functor from {{M|\mathscr{C} }} to another category, {{M|\mathscr{D} }} | ||
+ | ** {{M|T:\mathscr{C}\leadsto\mathscr{D} }} | ||
+ | * morphisms {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}}, {{M|g:Y\rightarrow Z}} and the morphism {{M|gf:X\rightarrow Z}} corresponding to the [[composition]] {{M|g\circ f}} | ||
+ | The functor gives us "the same" diagram (in terms of objects and arrows) in the target [[category]] {{M|\mathscr{D} }}, as shown by the following [[diagram]]: | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" border="1" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |<math> | ||
+ | \xymatrix{ | ||
+ | X \ar@{-->}@(u,ul)[rrrr] \ar[rr]^{gf}="gf" \ar[dr]_f="f" \ar& & Z \ar@{-->}@(u,ul)[rrrr] & & TX \ar[rr]^{Tgf}="tgf" \ar[dr]_{Tf}="tf" & & TZ\\ | ||
+ | & Y \ar[ur]_{g}="g" \ar@{-->}@(d,dl)[rrrr] & & & & TY \ar[ur]_{Tg}="tg" | ||
+ | \ar@{.>}@/^/ "gf";"tgf" \ar@{.>}@/_/ "f";"tf" \ar@{.>}@/^/ "g";"tg" | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! The dashed lines represent {{M|T}}'s image of objects<br/>The dotted lines are the image of morphisms under {{M|T}} | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | * In this diagram the objects {{M|TX}}, {{M|TY}} and {{M|TZ}} are in a different category. | ||
+ | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
{{Definition|Category Theory}} | {{Definition|Category Theory}} |
Latest revision as of 16:27, 2 February 2016
TODO: Flesh this page out
Definition
A covariant functor, T:C⇝D (for categories C and D) is a pair of mappings[1]:
- T:{Obj(C)⟶Obj(D)X⟼TX
- T:{Mor(C)⟶Mor(D)f⟼Tf
Which preserve composition of morphisms and the identity morphism of each object, that is to say:
- ∀f,g∈Mor(C)[Tfg=T(f∘g)=Tf∘Tg=TfTg] (I've added the ∘s in to make it more obvious to the reader what is going on)
- Where such composition makes sense. That is target(g)=source(f).
- and ∀A∈Obj(C)[T1A=1TA]
Thus if f:X→Y and g:Y→Z are morphisms of C, then the following diagram commutes:
Thus the diagram just depicts the requirement that:
|
Note that the diagram is basically just the "image" of
|
Discussion
Given
- 3 objects, X, Y and Z in a category C
- a (covariant) functor from C to another category, D
- T:C⇝D
- morphisms f:X→Y, g:Y→Z and the morphism gf:X→Z corresponding to the composition g∘f
The functor gives us "the same" diagram (in terms of objects and arrows) in the target category D, as shown by the following diagram:
The dashed lines represent T's image of objects The dotted lines are the image of morphisms under T |
---|
- In this diagram the objects TX, TY and TZ are in a different category.