Difference between revisions of "Covariant functor"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Discussion)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{{:Covariant functor/Definition}}
 
{{:Covariant functor/Definition}}
 
==Discussion==
 
==Discussion==
 +
Given
 +
* 3 objects, {{M|X}}, {{M|Y}} and {{M|Z}} in a [[category]] {{M|\mathscr{C} }}
 +
* a (covariant) functor from {{M|\mathscr{C} }} to another category, {{M|\mathscr{D} }}
 +
**  {{M|T:\mathscr{C}\leadsto\mathscr{D} }}
 +
* morphisms {{M|f:X\rightarrow Y}}, {{M|g:Y\rightarrow Z}} and the morphism {{M|gf:X\rightarrow Z}} corresponding to the [[composition]] {{M|g\circ f}}
 +
The functor gives us "the same" diagram (in terms of objects and arrows) in the target [[category]] {{M|\mathscr{D} }}, as shown by the following [[diagram]]:
 +
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
 +
|-
 +
|<math>
 +
\xymatrix{
 +
X \ar@{-->}@(u,ul)[rrrr] \ar[rr]^{gf}="gf" \ar[dr]_f="f" \ar& & Z \ar@{-->}@(u,ul)[rrrr] & & TX \ar[rr]^{Tgf}="tgf" \ar[dr]_{Tf}="tf" & & TZ\\
 +
& Y \ar[ur]_{g}="g" \ar@{-->}@(d,dl)[rrrr] & & & & TY \ar[ur]_{Tg}="tg"
 +
\ar@{.>}@/^/ "gf";"tgf" \ar@{.>}@/_/ "f";"tf" \ar@{.>}@/^/ "g";"tg"
 +
}
 +
</math>
 +
|-
 +
! The dashed lines represent {{M|T}}'s image of objects<br/>The dotted lines are the image of morphisms under {{M|T}}
 +
|}
 +
* In this diagram the objects {{M|TX}}, {{M|TY}} and {{M|TZ}} are in a different category.
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
{{Definition|Category Theory}}
 
{{Definition|Category Theory}}

Latest revision as of 16:27, 2 February 2016


TODO: Flesh this page out


Definition

A covariant functor, T:CD (for categories C and D) is a pair of mappings[1]:

  • T:{Obj(C)Obj(D)XTX
  • T:{Mor(C)Mor(D)fTf

Which preserve composition of morphisms and the identity morphism of each object, that is to say:

  • f,gMor(C)[Tfg=T(fg)=TfTg=TfTg] (I've added the s in to make it more obvious to the reader what is going on)
    • Where such composition makes sense. That is target(g)=source(f).
  • and AObj(C)[T1A=1TA]

Thus if f:XY and g:YZ are morphisms of C, then the following diagram commutes:

Thus the diagram just depicts the requirement that:

  • =Tgf=TgTf
  Note that the diagram is
basically just the "image" of


under T

Discussion

Given

  • 3 objects, X, Y and Z in a category C
  • a (covariant) functor from C to another category, D
    • T:CD
  • morphisms f:XY, g:YZ and the morphism gf:XZ corresponding to the composition gf

The functor gives us "the same" diagram (in terms of objects and arrows) in the target category D, as shown by the following diagram:

The dashed lines represent T's image of objects
The dotted lines are the image of morphisms under T
  • In this diagram the objects TX, TY and TZ are in a different category.

References

  1. Jump up Algebra I: Rings, modules and categories - Carl Faith