Difference between revisions of "Exercises:Mond - Topology - 1/Question 7"
m (→Solution body: Added note) |
(Forgot chunk of proof) |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
In order to apply the [[compact-to-Hausdorff theorem]] and show {{M|\bar{f} }} is a [[homeomorphism]] we must show it is [[continuous]] and [[bijective]]. We already have continuity (as a result of the passing-to-the-quotient theorem), we must show it is bijective. | In order to apply the [[compact-to-Hausdorff theorem]] and show {{M|\bar{f} }} is a [[homeomorphism]] we must show it is [[continuous]] and [[bijective]]. We already have continuity (as a result of the passing-to-the-quotient theorem), we must show it is bijective. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We must show {{M|\bar{f} }} is both [[surjective]] and [[injective]]: | ||
+ | # [[Surjectivity]]: We can get this from the definition of {{M|\bar{f} }}, recall on the [[passing to the quotient (function)]] page that: | ||
+ | #* if {{M|f}} is surjective then {{M|\bar{f} }} (or {{M|\tilde{f} }} as the induced function is on that page) is surjective also | ||
+ | #** I've already done it "the long way" once in this assignment, and I hope it is not frowned upon if I decline to do it again. | ||
+ | # [[Injectivity]]: This follows a similar to gist as to what we've done already to show we could apply "passing to the quotient" and for the other questions where we've had to show a factored map is injective. As before: | ||
+ | #* Let {{M|x,y\in\frac{D^2}{\sim} }} be given. | ||
+ | #** Suppose {{M|1=\bar{f}(x)\ne\bar{f}(y)}} - then by the nature of [[logical implication]] we do not care about the RHS and are done regardless of {{M|x}} and {{M|y}}'s equality | ||
+ | #*** Once again I note we must really have {{M|x\ne y}} as if {{M|1=x=y}} then by definition of {{M|\bar{f} }} being a function we must also have {{M|1=\bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(y)}}, anyway! | ||
+ | #** Suppose that {{M|1=\bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(y)}}, we must show that in this case {{M|1=x=y}}. | ||
+ | #*** Note that by [[surjectivity]] of {{M|\pi}} that: {{M|1=\exists a\in D^2[\pi(a)=x]}} and {{M|1=\exists b\in D^2[\pi(b)=y]}}, so {{M|1=\bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(\pi(a))}} and {{M|1=\bar{f}(y)=\bar{f}(\pi(b))}}, also, as {{M|\bar{f} }} was the result of factoring, we have {{M|1=f=\bar{f}\circ\pi }}, so we see {{M|1=\bar{f}(\pi(a))=f(a)}} and {{M|1=\bar{f}(\pi(b))=f(b)}}, since {{M|1=\bar{f}(x)=\bar{f}(y)}} we get {{M|1=f(a)=f(b)}} and {{M|1=\bar{f}(\pi(a))=\bar{f}(\pi(b))}} also. | ||
+ | #**** We now have 2 cases, {{M|a\in D^2-\partial D^2}} and {{M|a\in \partial D^2}} respectively: | ||
+ | #****# Suppose {{M|a\in D^2-\partial D^2}} | ||
+ | #****#* As we have {{M|1=f(a)=f(b)}} we must have {{M|1=b=a}}, as if {{M|b\ne a}} then {{M|f(b)\ne f(a)}}, because {{M|f\big\vert_{D^2-\partial D^2}:(D^2-\partial D^2)\rightarrow\mathbb{S}^2}} is injective<ref group="Note">Actually: | ||
+ | * {{M|f\big\vert_{D^2-\partial D^2}:(D^2-\partial D^2)\rightarrow(\mathbb{S}^2-\{(0,0,1)\}) }} is bijective in fact!</ref> by construction | ||
+ | #****#** If {{M|1=b=a}} then {{M|1=y=\pi(b)=\pi(a)=x}} so {{M|1=y=x}} as required (this is easily recognised as {{M|1=x=y}}) | ||
+ | #****# Suppose {{M|a\in\partial D^2}} | ||
+ | #****#* Then to have {{M|1=f(a)=f(b)}} we must have {{M|1=b\in\partial D^2}} | ||
+ | #****#** This means {{M|1=a\sim b}}, and that means {{M|1=\pi(a)=\pi(b)}} | ||
+ | #****#*** But {{M|1=y=\pi(b)}} and {{M|1=x=\pi(a)}}, so we arrive at: {{M|1=x=\pi(a)=\pi(b)=y}}, or {{M|1=x=y}}, as required. | ||
+ | We now know {{M|\bar{f} }} is a continuous bijection. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Noting that {{M|D^2}} is [[closed set|closed]] and [[bounded (metric)|bounded]] we can apply the [[Heine–Borel theorem]] to show {{M|D^2}} is compact. As {{M|\pi:D^2\rightarrow\frac{D^2}{\sim} }} is [[continuous]] (see [[quotient topology]] for information) we can use "[[the image of a compact set is compact]]" to conclude that {{M|\frac{D^2}{\sim} }} is compact. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[A subspace of a Hausdorff space is a Hausdorff space]], as {{M|\mathbb{S}^2}} is a [[topological subspace]] of {{M|\mathbb{R}^3}}, {{M|\mathbb{S}^2}} is [[Hausdorff]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We may now use the [[compact-to-Hausdorff theorem]] (as {{M|\bar{f} }} is a bijective continuous map between a compact space to a Hausdorff space) to show that {{M|\bar{f} }} is a [[homeomorphism]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | As we have found a homeomorphism between {{M|\frac{D^2}{\sim} }} and {{M|\mathbb{S}^2}} we have shown they are homeomorphic, written: | ||
+ | * {{M|1=\frac{D^2}{\sim}\cong\mathbb{S}^2}}. | ||
<div style="clear:both;"></div> | <div style="clear:both;"></div> | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 23:26, 11 October 2016
Contents
[hide]Section B
Question 7
Let D2 denote the closed unit disk in R2 and define an equivalence relation on D2 by setting x1∼x2 if ∥x1∥=∥x2∥=1 ("collapsing the boundary to a single point"). Show that D2∼ is homeomorphic to S2 - the sphere.
- Hint: first define a surjection (:D2→S2) mapping all of ∂D2 to the north pole. This may be defined using a good picture or a formula.
Solution
Definitions:
- H denotes the hemisphere in my picture.
- E:D2→H is the composition of maps in my diagram that take D2, double its radius, then embed it in R3 then "pop it out" into a hemisphere. We take it as obvious that it is a homeomorphism
- f′:H→S2, this is the map in the top picture. It takes the hemisphere and pulls the boundary/rim in (along the blue lines) to the north pole of the red sphere. f′(∂H)=(0,0,1)∈R3, it should be clear that for all x∈H−∂H that f′(x) is intended to be a point on the red sphere and that f′|H−∂H is injective. It is also taken as clear that f′ is surjective
- Note: Click the pictures for a larger version
- D2∼ and D2/∼ denote the quotient space, with this definition we get a canonical projection, π:D2→D2/∼ given by π:x↦[x] where [x] denotes the equivalence class of x
- Lastly, we define f:D2→S2 to be the composition of E and f′, that is: f:=f′∘E, meaning f:x↦f′(E(x))
The situation is shown diagramatically below:
Outline of the solution:
- We then want apply the passing to the quotient theorem to yield a commutative diagram:
- Lastly, we will show that ˉf is a homeomorphism using the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem
Solution body
First we must show the requirements for applying passing to the quotient are satisfied.
- We know already the maps involved are continuous and that π is a quotient map. We only need to show:
- f is constant on the fibres of π, which is equivalent to:
- ∀x,y∈D2[π(x)=π(y)⟹f(x)=f(y)]
- f is constant on the fibres of π, which is equivalent to:
- Let us show this remaining condition:
- Let x,y∈D2 be given.
- Suppose π(x)≠π(y), then by the nature of logical implication the implication is true regardless of f(x) and f(y)'s equality. We're done in this case.
- Suppose π(x)=π(y), we must show that in this case f(x)=y(y).
- Suppose x∈D2−∂D2 (meaning x∈D2 but x∉∂D2, ie − denotes relative complement)
- In this case we must have x=y, as otherwise we'd not have π(x)=π(y) (for x∈D2−∂D2 we have π(x)=[x]={x}, that is that the equivalence classes are singletons. So if π(x)=π(y) we must have π(y)=[y]={x}=[x]=π(x); so y can only be x)
- If x=y then by the nature of f being a function we must have f(x)=f(y), we're done in this case
- Suppose x∈∂D2 (the only case not covered) and π(x)=π(y), we must show f(x)=f(y)
- Clearly if x∈∂D2 and π(x)=π(y) we must have y∈∂D2.
- E(x) is mapped to the boundary/rim of H, as is E(y) and f′(any point on the rim of H)=(0,0,1)∈R3
- Thus f′(E(x))=f′(E(y)), but f′(E(x)) is the very definition of f(x), so clearly:
- f(x)=f(y) as required.
- Clearly if x∈∂D2 and π(x)=π(y) we must have y∈∂D2.
- Suppose x∈D2−∂D2 (meaning x∈D2 but x∉∂D2, ie − denotes relative complement)
- Let x,y∈D2 be given.
We may now apply the passing to the quotient theorem. This yields:
- A continuous map, ˉf:D2/∼→S2 where f=ˉf∘π
In order to apply the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem and show ˉf is a homeomorphism we must show it is continuous and bijective. We already have continuity (as a result of the passing-to-the-quotient theorem), we must show it is bijective.
We must show ˉf is both surjective and injective:
- Surjectivity: We can get this from the definition of ˉf, recall on the passing to the quotient (function) page that:
- if f is surjective then ˉf (or ˜f as the induced function is on that page) is surjective also
- I've already done it "the long way" once in this assignment, and I hope it is not frowned upon if I decline to do it again.
- if f is surjective then ˉf (or ˜f as the induced function is on that page) is surjective also
- Injectivity: This follows a similar to gist as to what we've done already to show we could apply "passing to the quotient" and for the other questions where we've had to show a factored map is injective. As before:
- Let x,y∈D2∼ be given.
- Suppose ˉf(x)≠ˉf(y) - then by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the RHS and are done regardless of x and y's equality
- Once again I note we must really have x≠y as if x=y then by definition of ˉf being a function we must also have ˉf(x)=ˉf(y), anyway!
- Suppose that ˉf(x)=ˉf(y), we must show that in this case x=y.
- Note that by surjectivity of π that: ∃a∈D2[π(a)=x] and ∃b∈D2[π(b)=y], so ˉf(x)=ˉf(π(a)) and ˉf(y)=ˉf(π(b)), also, as ˉf was the result of factoring, we have f=ˉf∘π, so we see ˉf(π(a))=f(a) and ˉf(π(b))=f(b), since ˉf(x)=ˉf(y) we get f(a)=f(b) and ˉf(π(a))=ˉf(π(b)) also.
- We now have 2 cases, a∈D2−∂D2 and a∈∂D2 respectively:
- Suppose a∈D2−∂D2
- As we have f(a)=f(b) we must have b=a, as if b≠a then f(b)≠f(a), because f|D2−∂D2:(D2−∂D2)→S2 is injective[Note 2] by construction
- If b=a then y=π(b)=π(a)=x so y=x as required (this is easily recognised as x=y)
- As we have f(a)=f(b) we must have b=a, as if b≠a then f(b)≠f(a), because f|D2−∂D2:(D2−∂D2)→S2 is injective[Note 2] by construction
- Suppose a∈∂D2
- Then to have f(a)=f(b) we must have b∈∂D2
- This means a∼b, and that means π(a)=π(b)
- But y=π(b) and x=π(a), so we arrive at: x=π(a)=π(b)=y, or x=y, as required.
- This means a∼b, and that means π(a)=π(b)
- Then to have f(a)=f(b) we must have b∈∂D2
- Suppose a∈D2−∂D2
- We now have 2 cases, a∈D2−∂D2 and a∈∂D2 respectively:
- Note that by surjectivity of π that: ∃a∈D2[π(a)=x] and ∃b∈D2[π(b)=y], so ˉf(x)=ˉf(π(a)) and ˉf(y)=ˉf(π(b)), also, as ˉf was the result of factoring, we have f=ˉf∘π, so we see ˉf(π(a))=f(a) and ˉf(π(b))=f(b), since ˉf(x)=ˉf(y) we get f(a)=f(b) and ˉf(π(a))=ˉf(π(b)) also.
- Suppose ˉf(x)≠ˉf(y) - then by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the RHS and are done regardless of x and y's equality
- Let x,y∈D2∼ be given.
We now know ˉf is a continuous bijection.
Noting that D2 is closed and bounded we can apply the Heine–Borel theorem to show D2 is compact. As π:D2→D2∼ is continuous (see quotient topology for information) we can use "the image of a compact set is compact" to conclude that D2∼ is compact.
A subspace of a Hausdorff space is a Hausdorff space, as S2 is a topological subspace of R3, S2 is Hausdorff.
We may now use the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem (as ˉf is a bijective continuous map between a compact space to a Hausdorff space) to show that ˉf is a homeomorphism
As we have found a homeomorphism between D2∼ and S2 we have shown they are homeomorphic, written:
- D2∼≅S2.
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Technically a diagram is said to commute if all paths through it yield equal compositions, this means that we also require f=f′∘E, which we already have by definition of f!
- Jump up ↑ Actually:
- f|D2−∂D2:(D2−∂D2)→(S2−{(0,0,1)}) is bijective in fact!
References