Group factorisation theorem
From Maths
Contents
[hide]Statement
- If N\subseteq\text{Ker}(\varphi) then \varphi factors uniquely through \pi to yield \bar{\varphi}:G/N\rightarrow H given by \bar{\varphi}:[g]\mapsto\varphi(g) [Note 2]
Additionally we have \varphi=\overline{\varphi}\circ\pi (or in other terms, the diagram on the right commutes)
Proof
Notes
- Jump up ↑ The notation A\trianglelefteq B means A is a normal subgroup of the group B.
- Jump up ↑ This may look strange as obviously you're thinking "what if we took a different representative h\in[g] with h\ne g, then we'd have \varphi(h) instead of \varphi(g)!", these are actually the same, see Factor (function) for more details, I shall explain this here.
- Technically we have this: \bar{\varphi}:u\mapsto\varphi(\pi^{-1}(u)) for the definition of \bar{\varphi}
- Note though that if g,h\in\pi^{-1}(u) that:
- \pi(g)=\pi(h)=u and by hypothesis we have [\pi(x)=\pi(y)]\implies[\varphi(x)=\varphi(y)]
- Thus \varphi(g)=\varphi(h)
- \pi(g)=\pi(h)=u and by hypothesis we have [\pi(x)=\pi(y)]\implies[\varphi(x)=\varphi(y)]
- So whichever representative of [g] we use \varphi(h) for h\in[g] is the same.
- Note though that if g,h\in\pi^{-1}(u) that:
- This is actually all dealt with as a part of factor (function) not this theorem. However it is worth illustrating.
- Technically we have this: \bar{\varphi}:u\mapsto\varphi(\pi^{-1}(u)) for the definition of \bar{\varphi}
References
|