Poisson race distribution

From Maths
Revision as of 19:11, 31 December 2017 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Adding navbox)

Jump to: navigation, search
\newcommand{\P}[2][]{\mathbb{P}#1{\left[{#2}\right]} } \newcommand{\Pcond}[3][]{\mathbb{P}#1{\left[{#2}\!\ \middle\vert\!\ {#3}\right]} } \newcommand{\Plcond}[3][]{\Pcond[#1]{#2}{#3} } \newcommand{\Prcond}[3][]{\Pcond[#1]{#2}{#3} }

Definition

Let X\sim\text{Poi} (\lambda_1) and Y\sim\text{Poi}(\lambda_2) be given random variables (that are independent), then define a new random variable:

  • Z:\eq X-Y

WeAlec:[1] call this a "Poisson race" as in some sense they're racing, Z>0 then X is winning, Z\eq 0, neck and neck and Z<0 then Y is winning.

  • Caveat:Remember that Poisson measures stuff per unit thing, meaning, for example, that say we are talking "defects per mile of track" with \lambda_1 being the defects per mile of the left rail (defined somehow) and \lambda_2 the defects per mile of the right rail.
    • If there are 5 on the left and 3 on the right Z for that mile was +2 - the next mile is independent and doesn't start off with this bias, that is Z\eq 0 for the next mile it doesn't mean the right rail caught up with 2 more than the left for this mile.
    • So this doesn't model an ongoing race.

Descriptions

  • for k\ge 0 and k\in\mathbb{Z} we have:
    • Claim 1: \P{Z\eq k}\eq \lambda_1^k e^{-\lambda_1-\lambda_2} \sum_{i\in\mathbb{N}_0}\frac{(\lambda_1\lambda_2)^i}{i!(i+k)!} [Note 1], which may be written:
      • \P{Z\eq k}\eq \lambda_1^k e^{-\lambda_1-\lambda_2}\sum_{i\in\mathbb{N}_0}\left( \frac{(\lambda_1\lambda_2)^i}{(i!)^2}\cdot\frac{i!}{(i+k)!}\right) - this has some terms that look a bit like a Poisson term (squared) - perhaps it might lead to a closed form.
  • for k\le 0 and k\in\mathbb{Z} we can re-use the above result with X and Y flipped:
    • Can't find where I've written it down, will not guess it

Proof of claims

Grade: B
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Page 384 document spans consecutive numbers, squared, A4, no holes

Notes

  1. Jump up Note that \sum_{i\in\mathbb{N}_0}a_i means \sum^\infty_{i\eq 0}a_i - see Notes:Infinity notation

References

  1. Jump up I've heard this somewhere before, I can't remember where from - I've had a quick search, while not established it's in the right area