Equivalence class

From Maths
Revision as of 19:25, 14 November 2015 by JimDavis (Talk | contribs) (Equivalence classes are either the same or disjoint: - Proof)

Jump to: navigation, search

Definition

Given an Equivalence relation the equivalence class of a is denoted as follows:

[a]={b|ab}

Notations

An equivalence class may be denoted by [a] where a is the representative of it. There is an alternative representation:

  • ˆa, where again a is the representative of the class.[1]

I quite like the hat notation, however I recommend one avoids using it when there are multiple Equivalence relations at play.

If there are multiple ones, then we can write for example [a]1 for a class in 1 and [f]2 for 2

Equivalence relations partition sets

An equivalence relation is a partition

Equivalence classes are either the same or disjoint

Suppose there were two equivalence classes [a] and [b]. We can write the members of each class as [an] and [bn].

Suppose the two classes were both nonidentical and nondisjoint. Then there exists [a1][b1] and [a_2] \nsim [b_2]. However, [a_1] \sim [a_2] and [b_1] \sim [b_2], thus [a_2] \sim [b_2], a contradiction. Therefore the classes must be either identical or disjoint.

This is the motivation for how cosets partition groups.

References

  1. Jump up Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici



TODO: Add proofs and whatnot