A continuous map induces a homomorphism on fundamental groups

From Maths
Revision as of 02:20, 13 December 2016 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Saving work)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Important work!

Statement

Let (X,J) and (Y,K) be topological spaces, let φ:XY be a continuous map and let pX be the base point we consider for the fundamental group of X at p, π1(X,p). Then[1]:

Caveat:We are implicitly claiming it is well defined: as we do not have f when we write [f], to obtain f we must look at the inverse relation of the canonical projection, P1X([f]) in the notation developed next, giving us a set of all things equivalent to f and for any of these φ must yield the same result.

Formal definition

Diagram

With our situation we automatically have the following (which do not use their conventional symbols):

  • PX:Ω(X,p)π1(X,p)[Note 1][Note 2] is the canonical projection of the equivalence relation, i.e. PX:f[f]Ω(X,p)(()() (rel {0,1}));
  • PY:Ω(Y,φ(p))π1(Y,φ(p)) is the canonical projection as above but for Y, and
  • M:Ω(X,p)Ω(Y,φ(p)) by M:f(φf)

In this case we claim that[1]:

OLD Statement

Let (X,J) and (Y,K) be topological spaces, let φ:XY be a continuous map and let pX be the base point we consider for the fundamental group of X at p, π1(X,p) then we also have the following:

  • PX:Ω(X,p)π1(X,p)[Note 3][Note 4] is the canonical projection of the equivalence relation, i.e. PX:f[f]Ω(X,p)(()() (rel {0,1}));
  • PY:Ω(Y,φ(p))π1(Y,φ(p)) is the canonical projection as above but for Y, and
  • M:Ω(X,p)Ω(Y,φ(p)) by M:f(φf)

In this case we claim that[1]:

Informal definition

Informally, we define φ as follows:

  • φ:π1(X,p)π1(Y,φ(p)) defined by φ:[f][φf] is a group homomorphism

We claim that this is well-defined and that it is indeed a group homomorphism


Proof

Well-definedness of φ

The notation φ([f]) makes it seem like f is some given loop. Remember that we're actually dealing with equivalence classes not a loop, thus:

  • for απ1(X,p) we must define φ(α) - not so obvious now! We actually define:
    • {{M|\varphi_*(\alpha):\eq [f\circ\mathbb{P}^{-1}_X

Group homomorphism

We want to show that:

  • [f],[g]π1(X,p)[φ([f][g])=φ([f])φ([g])]

We will do this by operating on the left-hand-side (LHS) and the right-hand-side (RHS) separately.

  • Let [f],[g]π1(X,p) be given.
    • We now operate on the LHS and RHS:
      1. The LHS:
        • φ([f][g])
          =φ([fg]) (by the operation of the fundamental group) - note that here denotes loop concatenation of course.
          =[φ(fg)] (by definition of φ)
      2. The RHS:
        • φ([f])φ([g])
          =[φf][φg]
          =[(φf)(φg)]
    • Now we must show they're equal.
      1. Using the definition of loop concatenation we see LHS=φ({f(2t)for t[0,12]g(2t1)for t[12,1])={φ(f(2t))for t[0,12]φ(g(2t1)for t[12,1]
      2. Also using the definition of loop concatenation we see RHS={φ(f(2t))for t[0,12]φ(g(251))for t[12,1]
    • Clearly these are the same
  • Since [f],[g]π1(X,p) were arbitrary we have shown this for all. As required.

Stuff

By the composition of end-point-preserving-homotopic paths with a continuous map yields end-point-preserving-homotopic paths we know that if:

  • f1,f2:IX are paths and φ is a continuous map, as stated above, that:
    • If f1f2 (rel {0,1}) then (φf1)(φf2) (rel {0,1})

Notes

  1. Jump up πX is not used for the canonical projection because π is already in play as the fundamental group. Although it wouldn't lead to ambiguous writings, it's not helpful
  2. Jump up Recall that Ω(X,p) is the set of all loops in X based at pX. There is an operation, loop concatenation, but it isn't a monoid or even a semigroup yet! As concatenation is not associative
  3. Jump up πX is not used for the canonical projection because π is already in play as the fundamental group. Although it wouldn't lead to ambiguous writings, it's not helpful
  4. Jump up Recall that Ω(X,p) is the set of all loops in X based at pX. There is an operation, loop concatenation, but it isn't a monoid or even a semigroup yet! As concatenation is not associative

References

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Introduction to Topological Manifolds - John M. Lee