A continuous map induces a homomorphism on fundamental groups
Contents
[hide]Statement
Let (X,J) and (Y,K) be topological spaces, let φ:X→Y be a continuous map and let p∈X be the base point we consider for the fundamental group of X at p, π1(X,p). Then[1]:
- φ∗:π1(X,p)→π1(Y,φ(p)) defined by φ∗:[f]↦[φ∘f] is a homomorphism of the fundamental groups of X and Y
Caveat:We are implicitly claiming it is well defined: as we do not have f when we write [f], to obtain f we must look at the inverse relation of the canonical projection, P−1X([f]) in the notation developed next, giving us a set of all things equivalent to f and for any of these φ∗ must yield the same result.
- φ∗ is called the homomorphism induced by the continuous map φ
Formal definition
|
Diagram |
---|
With our situation we automatically have the following (which do not use their conventional symbols):
- PX:Ω(X,p)→π1(X,p)[Note 1][Note 2] is the canonical projection of the equivalence relation, i.e. PX:f↦[f]∈Ω(X,p)((⋅)≃(⋅) (rel {0,1}));
- PY:Ω(Y,φ(p))→π1(Y,φ(p)) is the canonical projection as above but for Y, and
- M:Ω(X,p)→Ω(Y,φ(p)) by M:f↦(φ∘f)
In this case we claim that[1]:
- φ∗(α):=PY(M(P−1X(α))) is an unambiguous (i.e. is well-defined) definition and is a group homomorphism.
- It is called the homomorphism induced by the continuous map φ
OLD Statement
Let (X,J) and (Y,K) be topological spaces, let φ:X→Y be a continuous map and let p∈X be the base point we consider for the fundamental group of X at p, π1(X,p) then we also have the following:
- PX:Ω(X,p)→π1(X,p)[Note 3][Note 4] is the canonical projection of the equivalence relation, i.e. PX:f↦[f]∈Ω(X,p)((⋅)≃(⋅) (rel {0,1}));
- PY:Ω(Y,φ(p))→π1(Y,φ(p)) is the canonical projection as above but for Y, and
- M:Ω(X,p)→Ω(Y,φ(p)) by M:f↦(φ∘f)
In this case we claim that[1]:
- φ∗(α):=PY(M(P−1X(α))) is an unambiguous (i.e. is well-defined) definition and is a group homomorphism.
- It is called the homomorphism induced by the continuous map φ
Informal definition
Informally, we define φ∗ as follows:
- φ∗:π1(X,p)→π1(Y,φ(p)) defined by φ∗:[f]↦[φ∘f] is a group homomorphism
We claim that this is well-defined and that it is indeed a group homomorphism
Proof
Well-definedness of φ∗
The notation φ∗([f]) makes it seem like f is some given loop. Remember that we're actually dealing with equivalence classes not a loop, thus:
- for α∈π1(X,p) we must define φ∗(α) - not so obvious now! We actually define:
- {{M|\varphi_*(\alpha):\eq [f\circ\mathbb{P}^{-1}_X
Group homomorphism
We want to show that:
- ∀[f],[g]∈π1(X,p)[φ∗([f]⋅[g])=φ∗([f])⋅φ∗([g])]
We will do this by operating on the left-hand-side (LHS) and the right-hand-side (RHS) separately.
- Let [f],[g]∈π1(X,p) be given.
- We now operate on the LHS and RHS:
- The LHS:
- φ∗([f]⋅[g])
- =φ∗([f∗g]) (by the operation of the fundamental group) - note that ∗ here denotes loop concatenation of course.
- =[φ∘(f∗g)] (by definition of φ∗)
- φ∗([f]⋅[g])
- The RHS:
- φ∗([f])⋅φ∗([g])
- =[φ∘f]⋅[φ∘g]
- =[(φ∘f)∗(φ∘g)]
- φ∗([f])⋅φ∗([g])
- The LHS:
- Now we must show they're equal.
- Using the definition of loop concatenation we see LHS=φ∘({f(2t)for t∈[0,12]g(2t−1)for t∈[12,1])={φ(f(2t))for t∈[0,12]φ(g(2t−1)for t∈[12,1]
- Also using the definition of loop concatenation we see RHS={φ(f(2t))for t∈[0,12]φ(g(25−1))for t∈[12,1]
- Clearly these are the same
- We now operate on the LHS and RHS:
- Since [f],[g]∈π1(X,p) were arbitrary we have shown this for all. As required.
Stuff
By the composition of end-point-preserving-homotopic paths with a continuous map yields end-point-preserving-homotopic paths we know that if:
- f1,f2:I→X are paths and φ is a continuous map, as stated above, that:
- If f1≃f2 (rel {0,1}) then (φ∘f1)≃(φ∘f2) (rel {0,1})
Notes
- Jump up ↑ πX is not used for the canonical projection because π is already in play as the fundamental group. Although it wouldn't lead to ambiguous writings, it's not helpful
- Jump up ↑ Recall that Ω(X,p) is the set of all loops in X based at p∈X. There is an operation, loop concatenation, but it isn't a monoid or even a semigroup yet! As concatenation is not associative
- Jump up ↑ πX is not used for the canonical projection because π is already in play as the fundamental group. Although it wouldn't lead to ambiguous writings, it's not helpful
- Jump up ↑ Recall that Ω(X,p) is the set of all loops in X based at p∈X. There is an operation, loop concatenation, but it isn't a monoid or even a semigroup yet! As concatenation is not associative
References