Dynkin system/Proof that definitions 1 and 2 are equivalent

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search

\newcommand{\bigudot}{ \mathchoice{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-15mu\cdot\mkern8mu}}{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-13mu\cdot\mkern5mu}}{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-13mu\cdot\mkern5mu}}{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-13mu\cdot\mkern5mu}} }\newcommand{\udot}{\cup\mkern-12.5mu\cdot\mkern6.25mu\!}\require{AMScd}\newcommand{\d}[1][]{\mathrm{d}^{#1} }

Claim

The following definitions are the same:

Definition 1 Definition 2

Given a set X and a family of subsets of X, which we shall denote \mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}(X) is a Dynkin system[1] if:

  • X\in\mathcal{D}
  • For any D\in\mathcal{D} we have D^c\in\mathcal{D}
  • For any (D_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{D} is a sequence of pairwise disjoint sets we have \udot_{n=1}^\infty D_n\in\mathcal{D}

Given a set X and a family of subsets of X we denote \mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}(X) is a Dynkin system[2] on X if:

  • X\in\mathcal{D}
  • \forall A,B\in\mathcal{D}[B\subseteq A\implies A-B\in\mathcal{D}]
  • Given a sequence (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{D} that is increasing[Note 1] and has \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(A_n)=A we have A\in\mathcal{D}

Proof


TODO: Flesh out the algebra (blue boxes)


Definition 1 \implies definition 2

Let \mathcal{D} be a subgroup satisfying definition 1, then I claim it satisfies definition 2. Let us check the conditions.
  1. X\in\mathcal{D} is satisfied by definition
  2. For A,B\in\mathcal{D} with B\subseteq A then A-B\in\mathcal{D}
    • Note that A-B=(A^c\udot B)^c (this is not true in general, it requires B\subseteq AInclude ven diagram
    As by hypothesis \mathcal{D} is closed under complements and disjoint unions, we see that (A^c\udot B)^c\in\mathcal{D} thus
    • we have A-B\in\mathcal{D}
  3. Given (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{D} being an increasing sequence of subsets, we have \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(A_n)=A where A:=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n (See limit of an increasing sequence of sets for more information)
    Let (A_n)_{n=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{D} be given.
    Define a new sequence of sets, (B_n)_{n=1}^\infty by:
    • B_1=A_1
    • B_n=A_n-B_{n-1}
    This is a pairwise disjoint sequence of sets.
    Now by hypothesis \bigudot_{n=1}^\infty B_n\in\mathcal{D}
    • Note that \bigudot_{n=1}^\infty B_n=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n
    So we have \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n\in\mathcal{D} := A, thus the limit is in \mathcal{D} - as required.

This completes the first half of the proof.

The second half isn't tricky, the only bit I recommend knowing is A\udot B=(A^c-B)^c

TODO: That second half



Notes

  1. Jump up Recall this means A_{n}\subseteq A_{n+1}

References

  1. Jump up Measures, Integrals and Martingales - René L. Schilling
  2. Jump up Probability and Stochastics - Erhan Cinlar