Exercises:Mond - Topology - 1/Question 7
Contents
[hide]Section B
Question 7
Let D2 denote the closed unit disk in R2 and define an equivalence relation on D2 by setting x1∼x2 if ∥x1∥=∥x2∥=1 ("collapsing the boundary to a single point"). Show that D2∼ is homeomorphic to S2 - the sphere.
- Hint: first define a surjection (:D2→S2) mapping all of ∂D2 to the north pole. This may be defined using a good picture or a formula.
Solution
Definitions:
- H denotes the hemisphere in my picture.
- E:D2→H is the composition of maps in my diagram that take D2, double its radius, then embed it in R3 then "pop it out" into a hemisphere. We take it as obvious that it is a homeomorphism
- f′:H→S2, this is the map in the top picture. It takes the hemisphere and pulls the boundary/rim in (along the blue lines) to the north pole of the red sphere. f′(∂H)=(0,0,1)∈R3, it should be clear that for all x∈H−∂H that f′(x) is intended to be a point on the red sphere and that f′|H−∂H is injective. It is also taken as clear that f′ is surjective
- Note: Click the pictures for a larger version
- D2∼ and D2/∼ denote the quotient space, with this definition we get a canonical projection, π:D2→D2/∼ given by π:x↦[x] where [x] denotes the equivalence class of x
- Lastly, we define f:D2→S2 to be the composition of E and f′, that is: f:=f′∘E, meaning f:x↦f′(E(x))
The situation is shown diagramatically below:
Outline of the solution:
- We then want apply the passing to the quotient theorem to yield a commutative diagram:
- Lastly, we will show that ˉf is a homeomorphism using the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem
Solution body
First we must show the requirements for applying passing to the quotient are satisfied.
- We know already the maps involved are continuous and that π is a quotient map. We only need to show:
- f is constant on the fibres of π, which is equivalent to:
- ∀x,y∈D2[π(x)=π(y)⟹f(x)=f(y)]
- f is constant on the fibres of π, which is equivalent to:
- Let us show this remaining condition:
- Let x,y∈D2 be given.
- Suppose π(x)≠π(y), then by the nature of logical implication the implication is true regardless of f(x) and f(y)'s equality. We're done in this case.
- Suppose π(x)=π(y), we must show that in this case f(x)=y(y).
- Suppose x∈D2−∂D2 (meaning x∈D2 but x∉∂D2, ie − denotes relative complement)
- In this case we must have x=y, as otherwise we'd not have π(x)=π(y) (for x∈D2−∂D2 we have π(x)=[x]={x}, that is that the equivalence classes are singletons. So if π(x)=π(y) we must have π(y)=[y]={x}=[x]=π(x); so y can only be x)
- If x=y then by the nature of f being a function we must have f(x)=f(y), we're done in this case
- Suppose x∈∂D2 (the only case not covered) and π(x)=π(y), we must show f(x)=f(y)
- Clearly if x∈∂D2 and π(x)=π(y) we must have y∈∂D2.
- E(x) is mapped to the boundary/rim of H, as is E(y) and f′(any point on the rim of H)=(0,0,1)∈R3
- Thus f′(E(x))=f′(E(y)), but f′(E(x)) is the very definition of f(x), so clearly:
- f(x)=f(y) as required.
- Clearly if x∈∂D2 and π(x)=π(y) we must have y∈∂D2.
- Suppose x∈D2−∂D2 (meaning x∈D2 but x∉∂D2, ie − denotes relative complement)
- Let x,y∈D2 be given.
We may now apply the passing to the quotient theorem. This yields:
- A continuous map, ˉf:D2/∼→S2 where f=ˉf∘π
In order to apply the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem and show ˉf is a homeomorphism we must show it is continuous and bijective. We already have continuity (as a result of the passing-to-the-quotient theorem), we must show it is bijective.
We must show ˉf is both surjective and injective:
- Surjectivity: We can get this from the definition of ˉf, recall on the passing to the quotient (function) page that:
- if f is surjective then ˉf (or ˜f as the induced function is on that page) is surjective also
- I've already done it "the long way" once in this assignment, and I hope it is not frowned upon if I decline to do it again.
- if f is surjective then ˉf (or ˜f as the induced function is on that page) is surjective also
- Injectivity: This follows a similar to gist as to what we've done already to show we could apply "passing to the quotient" and for the other questions where we've had to show a factored map is injective. As before:
- Let x,y∈D2∼ be given.
- Suppose ˉf(x)≠ˉf(y) - then by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the RHS and are done regardless of x and y's equality
- Once again I note we must really have x≠y as if x=y then by definition of ˉf being a function we must also have ˉf(x)=ˉf(y), anyway!
- Suppose that ˉf(x)=ˉf(y), we must show that in this case x=y.
- Note that by surjectivity of π that: ∃a∈D2[π(a)=x] and ∃b∈D2[π(b)=y], so ˉf(x)=ˉf(π(a)) and ˉf(y)=ˉf(π(b)), also, as ˉf was the result of factoring, we have f=ˉf∘π, so we see ˉf(π(a))=f(a) and ˉf(π(b))=f(b), since ˉf(x)=ˉf(y) we get f(a)=f(b) and ˉf(π(a))=ˉf(π(b)) also.
- We now have 2 cases, a∈D2−∂D2 and a∈∂D2 respectively:
- Suppose a∈D2−∂D2
- As we have f(a)=f(b) we must have b=a, as if b≠a then f(b)≠f(a), because f|D2−∂D2:(D2−∂D2)→S2 is injective[Note 2] by construction
- If b=a then y=π(b)=π(a)=x so y=x as required (this is easily recognised as x=y)
- As we have f(a)=f(b) we must have b=a, as if b≠a then f(b)≠f(a), because f|D2−∂D2:(D2−∂D2)→S2 is injective[Note 2] by construction
- Suppose a∈∂D2
- Then to have f(a)=f(b) we must have b∈∂D2
- This means a∼b, and that means π(a)=π(b)
- But y=π(b) and x=π(a), so we arrive at: x=π(a)=π(b)=y, or x=y, as required.
- This means a∼b, and that means π(a)=π(b)
- Then to have f(a)=f(b) we must have b∈∂D2
- Suppose a∈D2−∂D2
- We now have 2 cases, a∈D2−∂D2 and a∈∂D2 respectively:
- Note that by surjectivity of π that: ∃a∈D2[π(a)=x] and ∃b∈D2[π(b)=y], so ˉf(x)=ˉf(π(a)) and ˉf(y)=ˉf(π(b)), also, as ˉf was the result of factoring, we have f=ˉf∘π, so we see ˉf(π(a))=f(a) and ˉf(π(b))=f(b), since ˉf(x)=ˉf(y) we get f(a)=f(b) and ˉf(π(a))=ˉf(π(b)) also.
- Suppose ˉf(x)≠ˉf(y) - then by the nature of logical implication we do not care about the RHS and are done regardless of x and y's equality
- Let x,y∈D2∼ be given.
We now know ˉf is a continuous bijection.
Noting that D2 is closed and bounded we can apply the Heine–Borel theorem to show D2 is compact. As π:D2→D2∼ is continuous (see quotient topology for information) we can use "the image of a compact set is compact" to conclude that D2∼ is compact.
A subspace of a Hausdorff space is a Hausdorff space, as S2 is a topological subspace of R3, S2 is Hausdorff.
We may now use the compact-to-Hausdorff theorem (as ˉf is a bijective continuous map between a compact space to a Hausdorff space) to show that ˉf is a homeomorphism
As we have found a homeomorphism between D2∼ and S2 we have shown they are homeomorphic, written:
- D2∼≅S2.
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Technically a diagram is said to commute if all paths through it yield equal compositions, this means that we also require f=f′∘E, which we already have by definition of f!
- Jump up ↑ Actually:
- f|D2−∂D2:(D2−∂D2)→(S2−{(0,0,1)}) is bijective in fact!
References