Interior point (topology)
Contents
[hide]Definition
Metric space
Given a metric space (X,d) and an arbitrary subset U⊆X, a point x∈X is interior to U[1] if:
- ∃δ>0[Bδ(x)⊆U]
Relation to Neighbourhood
This definition is VERY similar to that of a neighbourhood. In fact that I believe "U is a neighbourhood of x" is simply a generalisation of interior point to topological spaces. Note that:
Claim: x is interior to U ⟹ U is a neighbourhood of x
This implication can only go one way as in an arbitrary topological space (which may not have a metric that induces it) there is no notion of open balls (as there's no metric!) thus there can be no notion of interior point.[Note 1]
Topological space
In a topological space (X,J) and given an arbitrary subset of X, U⊆X we can say that a point, x∈X, is an interior point of U[2] if:
- U is a neighbourhood of x
- Recall that if U is a neighbourhood of x we require ∃O∈J[x∈O⊆U]
Relation to Neighbourhood
We can see that in a topological space that neighbourhood to and interior point of are equivalent. This site (like[2]) defines neighbourhood to as containing an open set with the point in it. However some authors (notably Munkres) do not use this definition and use neighbourhood as a synonym for open set. In this case interior point of and neighbourhood to are not equivalent.
I don't like the term interior point as it suggests some notion of being inside, but the point being in the set is not enough for it to be interior! So I am happy with this and stand by the comments on the neighbourhood page
See also
Notes
- Jump up ↑ At least not with this definition of interior point, this probably motivates the topological definition of interior point