Notes:Basis for a topology/Attempt 2

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search

Overview

Last time I tried to merge the definitions, which got very confusing! This time I shall treat them as separate things and go from there.

Definitions

Here we will use GBasis for a generated topology (by a basis) and TBasis for a basis of an existing topology.

GBasis

Let X be a set and BP(X) be a collection of subsets of X. Then we say:

  • B is a GBasis if it satisfies the following 2 conditions:
    1. xXBB[xB] - every element of X is contained in some GBasis set.
    2. B1,B2Bx B1B2B3B[B1B2(xB3B1B2)][Note 1][Note 2]

Then B induces a topology on X.

Let JInduced denote this topology, then:

  • UP(X)[UJInduced(pUBB[pBBU])]

TBasis

Suppose (X,J) is a topological space and BP(X) is some collection of subsets of X. We say:

  • B is a TBasis if it satisfies both of the following:
    1. BB[BJ] - all the basis elements are themselves open.
    2. UJ{Bα}αI[αIBα=U]

If we have a TBasis for a topological space then we may talk about its open sets differently:

  • UP(X)[UJ(pUBB[pBBU])]

Facts

  1. B is a GBasis of X inducing (X,J) B is a TBasis for the (X,J)
  2. (X,J) is a topological space with a TBasis B B is a GBasis

Result

  1. Lemma: B is a TBasis of (X,J) B is a GBasis (inducing (X,J)) B is a TBasis of (X,J)
  2. Proposition: J=J (using the method of proof of fact 1 part 3 (the bit with the warning - as it isn't needed there))
  3. Theorem: B is a TBasis of (X,J) B is a GBasis (inducing (X,J)) B is a TBasis of (X,J)
  4. Proposition: B is a Tbasis of (X,J) B is a GBasis inducing (X,J)

Proof of facts

  1. B is a GBasis of X inducing (X,J) B is a TBasis for the (X,J)
    • Let B be a GBasis, suppose it generates the topological space (X,J), we will show it's also a TBasis of (X,J)
      1. BB[BJ] must be shown
        • Let BB be given.
          • Recall UJxUBB[xBBU]
          • Let xB be given.
            • Choose B:=B
              • xB by definition, as xB=B and
              • we have BB, by the implies-subset relation, if and only if pB[pB] which is trivial.
          • Thus BJ
        • Since BB was arbitrary we have shown BB[BJ]
      2. UJ{Bα}αI[αIBα=U] must be shown
        • Let UJ be given.
          • Then, as B is a GBasis, by definition of the open sets generated: xXBB[xBBU]
          • Let pU be given
            • Define Bp to be the B that exists such that pBp and BpU
          • We now have an .... thing, like a sequence but arbitrary, (Bp)pU or {Bp}pU - I need to come down on a notation for this - such that:
            • Bp(Bp)pU[pBpBpU]
          • We must now show pUBp=U, we can do this by showing pUBpU and pUBpU
            1. pUBpU
            2. UpUBp
              • Using the implies-subset relation we see: UpUBpxU[xpUBp], we will show the RHS instead.
                • Let xU be given
                  • Recall, by definition of union, xpUBpqU[xBq]
                    • Choose q:=x then we have xBx (as pBp is one of the defining conditions of choosing each Bp!)
              • Thus UpUBp
          • We have shown pUBp=U
        • Since UJ was arbitrary we have shown this for all UJ
      3. We must now show that B is a TBasis of (X,J) specifically. Warning:No we do not, but what I did here is useful in proving something else later
        • Recall that, by definition of B being a GBasis:
          • UP(X)[UJ(pUBB[pBBU])]
        • Recall that, by definition of B being a TBasis we can talk about open sets as:
          • UP(X)[UJ(pUBB[pBBU])] (for the topology it is a TBasis of, J)
        • We wish to show that J=J
          • Let UP(X) be given.
            • Then by definition of B being a GBasis:
              • UJ(pUBB[pBBU])
            • But by definition of B being a TBasis (of J):
              • (pUBB[pBBU])UJ
            • Combining these we see:
              • UJ(pUBB[pBBU])UJ
            • Thus: UJUJ
          • We have shown UP(X)[UJUJ]
          • For any topology on X, K we require: KP(X). So,
            • we know: VJ[VP(X)] (from the implies-subset relation), and VJ[VP(X)]
          • We want to show J=J remember, we will do this by showing JJ and JJ
            1. Showing JJ, using the implies-subset relation this is the same as showing VJ[VJ]
              • Let VJ be given.
                • Then VP(X)
                • But we know: WP(X)[WJWJ], so we can apply this using V.
                  • We see VJVJ
                    • But by definition VJ !
                  • So VJ
              • Since VJ was arbitrary we have shown that for all such V that VJ
            2. Showing JJ is almost exactly the same, so rather than copy and paste and change a few symbols, I'll just say "same as above".
        • We have shown that J=J
    • This completes the proof.
    • We have shown that if B is a GBasis that not only is it a TBasis

Notes

  1. Jump up Note that xB3B1B2 is short for:
    • xB3B3B1B2
  2. Jump up Note that if B1B2 is empty (they do not intersect) then the logical implication is true regardless of the RHS of the } sign, so we do not care if we have xB3B3B1B2! Pick any xX and aany B3B!