Notes:Basis for a topology/Attempt 2
From Maths
Contents
[hide]Overview
Last time I tried to merge the definitions, which got very confusing! This time I shall treat them as separate things and go from there.
Definitions
Here we will use GBasis for a generated topology (by a basis) and TBasis for a basis of an existing topology.
GBasis
Let X be a set and B⊆P(X) be a collection of subsets of X. Then we say:
- B is a GBasis if it satisfies the following 2 conditions:
Then B induces a topology on X.
Let JInduced denote this topology, then:
- ∀U∈P(X)[U∈JInduced⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])]
TBasis
Suppose (X,J) is a topological space and B⊆P(X) is some collection of subsets of X. We say:
- B is a TBasis if it satisfies both of the following:
- ∀B∈B[B∈J] - all the basis elements are themselves open.
- ∀U∈J∃{Bα}α∈I[⋃α∈IBα=U]
If we have a TBasis for a topological space then we may talk about its open sets differently:
- ∀U∈P(X)[U∈J⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])]
Facts
- B is a GBasis of X inducing (X,J′) ⟹ B is a TBasis for the (X,J′)
- (X,J) is a topological space with a TBasis B ⟹ B is a GBasis
Result
- Lemma: B is a TBasis of (X,J) ⟹ B is a GBasis (inducing (X,J′)) ⟹ B is a TBasis of (X,J′)
- Proposition: J=J′ (using the method of proof of fact 1 part 3 (the bit with the warning - as it isn't needed there))
- Theorem: B is a TBasis of (X,J) ⟹ B is a GBasis (inducing (X,J)) ⟹ B is a TBasis of (X,J)
- Proposition: B is a Tbasis of (X,J) ⟺ B is a GBasis inducing (X,J)
Proof of facts
- B is a GBasis of X inducing (X,J′) ⟹ B is a TBasis for the (X,J′)
- Let B be a GBasis, suppose it generates the topological space (X,J′), we will show it's also a TBasis of (X,J′)
- ∀B∈B[B∈J′] must be shown
- Let B∈B be given.
- Recall U∈J′⟺∀x∈U∃B′∈B[x∈B′∧B′⊆U]
- Let x∈B be given.
- Choose B′:=B
- x∈B′ by definition, as x∈B′=B and
- we have B⊆B, by the implies-subset relation, if and only if ∀p∈B[p∈B] which is trivial.
- Choose B′:=B
- Thus B∈J′
- Since B∈B was arbitrary we have shown ∀B∈B[B∈J′]
- Let B∈B be given.
- ∀U∈J′∃{Bα}α∈I[⋃α∈IBα=U] must be shown
- Let U∈J′ be given.
- Then, as B is a GBasis, by definition of the open sets generated: ∀x∈X∃B∈B[x∈B∧B⊆U]
- Let p∈U be given
- Define Bp to be the B that exists such that p∈Bp and Bp⊆U
- We now have an .... thing, like a sequence but arbitrary, (Bp)p∈U or {Bp}p∈U - I need to come down on a notation for this - such that:
- ∀Bp∈(Bp)p∈U[p∈Bp∧Bp⊆U]
- We must now show ⋃p∈UBp=U, we can do this by showing ⋃p∈UBp⊆U and ⋃p∈UBp⊇U
- ⋃p∈UBp⊆U
- Using the union of subsets is a subset of the union we see:
- ⋃p∈UBp⊆U]
- Using the union of subsets is a subset of the union we see:
- U⊆⋃p∈UBp
- Using the implies-subset relation we see: U⊆⋃p∈UBp⟺∀x∈U[x∈⋃p∈UBp], we will show the RHS instead.
- Let x∈U be given
- Recall, by definition of union, x∈⋃p∈UBp⟺∃q∈U[x∈Bq]
- Choose q:=x then we have x∈Bx (as p∈Bp is one of the defining conditions of choosing each Bp!)
- Recall, by definition of union, x∈⋃p∈UBp⟺∃q∈U[x∈Bq]
- Let x∈U be given
- Thus U⊆⋃p∈UBp
- Using the implies-subset relation we see: U⊆⋃p∈UBp⟺∀x∈U[x∈⋃p∈UBp], we will show the RHS instead.
- ⋃p∈UBp⊆U
- We have shown ⋃p∈UBp=U
- Since U∈J′ was arbitrary we have shown this for all U∈J′
- Let U∈J′ be given.
- We must now show that B is a TBasis of (X,J′) specifically. Warning:No we do not, but what I did here is useful in proving something else later
- Recall that, by definition of B being a GBasis:
- ∀U∈P(X)[U∈J′⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])]
- Recall that, by definition of B being a TBasis we can talk about open sets as:
- ∀U∈P(X)[U∈J⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])] (for the topology it is a TBasis of, J)
- We wish to show that J′=J
- Let U∈P(X) be given.
- Then by definition of B being a GBasis:
- U∈J′⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])
- But by definition of B being a TBasis (of J):
- (∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])⟺U∈J
- Combining these we see:
- U∈J′⟺(∀p∈U∃B∈B[p∈B∧B⊆U])⟺U∈J
- Thus: U∈J′⟺U∈J
- Then by definition of B being a GBasis:
- We have shown ∀U∈P(X)[U∈J′⟺U∈J]
- For any topology on X, K we require: K⊆P(X). So,
- we know: ∀V∈J[V∈P(X)] (from the implies-subset relation), and ∀V′∈J′[V′∈P(X)]
- We want to show J=J′ remember, we will do this by showing J⊆J′ and J′⊆J
- Showing J⊆J′, using the implies-subset relation this is the same as showing ∀V∈J[V∈J′]
- Let V∈J be given.
- Then V∈P(X)
- But we know: ∀W∈P(X)[W∈J⟺W∈J′], so we can apply this using V.
- We see V∈J⟺V∈J′
- But by definition V∈J !
- So V∈J′
- We see V∈J⟺V∈J′
- Since V∈J was arbitrary we have shown that for all such V that V∈J′
- Let V∈J be given.
- Showing J′⊆J is almost exactly the same, so rather than copy and paste and change a few symbols, I'll just say "same as above".
- Showing J⊆J′, using the implies-subset relation this is the same as showing ∀V∈J[V∈J′]
- Let U∈P(X) be given.
- We have shown that J=J′
- Recall that, by definition of B being a GBasis:
- ∀B∈B[B∈J′] must be shown
- This completes the proof.
- We have shown that if B is a GBasis that not only is it a TBasis
- Let B be a GBasis, suppose it generates the topological space (X,J′), we will show it's also a TBasis of (X,J′)
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Note that x∈B3⊆B1∩B2 is short for:
- x∈B3∧B3⊆B1∩B2
- Jump up ↑ Note that if B1∩B2 is empty (they do not intersect) then the logical implication is true regardless of the RHS of the ⟹} sign, so we do not care if we have x∈B3∧B3⊆B1∩B2! Pick any x∈X and aany B3∈B!