Difference between revisions of "User talk:Boris"
(→Some questions.: one answer and one non-answer) |
(→Measure Theory terminology: new section) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:# The measure is continuous w.r.t. the monotone convergence of (measurable) sets. It means, the limit of an increasing sequence of sets is (by definition) their union. A more general notion: {{M|A_n\to A}} when the sequence of their indicator functions (in other words, characteristic functions) converges pointwise to the indicator of ''A''. If you want to see a topology (not just convergence), well, it is the product topology on the product of two-point sets {0,1} over all points of the given space (transferred from indicator functions to sets). But, alas, ''sequential'' continuity is far not the (usual) continuity (since the product space is not metrizable). | :# The measure is continuous w.r.t. the monotone convergence of (measurable) sets. It means, the limit of an increasing sequence of sets is (by definition) their union. A more general notion: {{M|A_n\to A}} when the sequence of their indicator functions (in other words, characteristic functions) converges pointwise to the indicator of ''A''. If you want to see a topology (not just convergence), well, it is the product topology on the product of two-point sets {0,1} over all points of the given space (transferred from indicator functions to sets). But, alas, ''sequential'' continuity is far not the (usual) continuity (since the product space is not metrizable). | ||
:# No, sorry; I am a probabilist, far not algebraist; I never teach algebra, I do not keep algebra textbooks on my shelf, and I have no opinion. I only could go to the library and browse, but you in Warwick can do it equally well. In the theory of Hilbert spaces I see "{{M|\bigoplus}}" and never the others, but this is not an argument. [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 12:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC) | :# No, sorry; I am a probabilist, far not algebraist; I never teach algebra, I do not keep algebra textbooks on my shelf, and I have no opinion. I only could go to the library and browse, but you in Warwick can do it equally well. In the theory of Hilbert spaces I see "{{M|\bigoplus}}" and never the others, but this is not an argument. [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 12:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Measure Theory terminology == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I was reading again a few nights ago and suddenly it became rather obvious what was going on. I've settled on this [[Notes:Measure theory plan]] terminology and I wonder what you think before I fully commit [[User:Alec|Alec]] ([[User talk:Alec|talk]]) 22:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:20, 23 March 2016
You seem to find all the oldest pages!
This project started on the 12th of Feb 2015 and it seems you've found all the oldest pages! Back when I didn't really know how to use a wiki! If you do find any that are bad, please mark them with {{Dire page}} this makes them a priority for being turned into "stub pages", stubs marked with {{Stub page}} - this means they're short and need fleshing out but provide some useful information. Lastly, if you encounter anything with 1 reference, or few references (for a large bit of content) please mark it with {{Requires references}}. The other to-do markers are:
- {{Todo}} - for small things, like add a few links, minor change
- {{Requires proof}} - some things are missing proofs.
In the old pages EVERYTHING uses the {{Todo}} template, which has given the To-do category a lot of clutter.
Lastly (on the note of marking), all these to-do templates support a comment, so for example you can use:
- {{Requires proof|Simple, just show {{M|X\implies Y}}}} say.
Measure theory is the oldest area (that's what I was working on at the time), as such I've started Site projects:Patrolling measure theory which is a snapshot of the entire measure theory category as it stood when the project started. This should ensure a minimum standard of quality across the site. Alec (talk) 20:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC) PS: I hope you've seen some good pages!
- I just took the first pages listed on Category:Definitions. Do you want me to do differently? Which way? I do not have a good orientation on this site, of course. Boris (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Some questions.
It just occurred to me that I can ask questions, you don't have to answer of course. There are a few things I haven't been able to work out.
- When a measure is "continuous from below", continuous with respect to what?
- Regarding Addition of vector spaces, I am not experienced enough to decide on a notation to stick to (and there are some contradictions, as noted on the note page), what do you take:
- [ilmath]\bigoplus[/ilmath]
- [ilmath]\bigoplus^\text{ext} [/ilmath] / [ilmath]\boxplus[/ilmath]
- [ilmath]\sum[/ilmath]
- [ilmath]\prod[/ilmath]
- to mean (Especially over arbitrary families)? I want to commit and write the page, but I'm afraid to do so until I understand the definitions and how they differ (even if there are trivial/canonical isomorphisms between them). Anything without a warning or not in a notes page is supposed to be trust-worthy.
I am surprised and quite pleased that there are only 2! Alec (talk) 23:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- The measure is continuous w.r.t. the monotone convergence of (measurable) sets. It means, the limit of an increasing sequence of sets is (by definition) their union. A more general notion: [ilmath]A_n\to A[/ilmath] when the sequence of their indicator functions (in other words, characteristic functions) converges pointwise to the indicator of A. If you want to see a topology (not just convergence), well, it is the product topology on the product of two-point sets {0,1} over all points of the given space (transferred from indicator functions to sets). But, alas, sequential continuity is far not the (usual) continuity (since the product space is not metrizable).
- No, sorry; I am a probabilist, far not algebraist; I never teach algebra, I do not keep algebra textbooks on my shelf, and I have no opinion. I only could go to the library and browse, but you in Warwick can do it equally well. In the theory of Hilbert spaces I see "[ilmath]\bigoplus[/ilmath]" and never the others, but this is not an argument. Boris (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Measure Theory terminology
I was reading again a few nights ago and suddenly it became rather obvious what was going on. I've settled on this Notes:Measure theory plan terminology and I wonder what you think before I fully commit Alec (talk) 22:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)