Difference between revisions of "Commutativity of intersection"
From Maths
(Created page with "<math>A\cap B=B\cap A</math> {{Todo}} {{Theorem|Set Theory}}") |
m (Alec moved page Commutivity of intersection to Commutativity of intersection: Typo in title (I think!)) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<math>A\cap B=B\cap A</math> | <math>A\cap B=B\cap A</math> | ||
− | |||
− | {{Theorem|Set Theory}} | + | ==Note== |
+ | This is somewhere between a theorem and a definition because at some point you have to accept "and" is commutative or something. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Proof== | ||
+ | ===<math>\implies</math>=== | ||
+ | <math>x\in A\cap B\implies x\in A\text{ and }x\in B\implies x\in B\text{ and }x\in A\implies x\in B\cap A</math>, thus by the [[Implies and subset relation|implies and subset relation]] we see <math>A\cap B\subset B\cap A</math> | ||
+ | ===<math>\impliedby</math>=== | ||
+ | By the exact same procedure we see <math>B\cap A\subset A\cap B</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus we conclude <math>A\cap B=B\cap A</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Theorem Of|Set Theory}} |
Latest revision as of 19:32, 28 October 2016
[math]A\cap B=B\cap A[/math]
Note
This is somewhere between a theorem and a definition because at some point you have to accept "and" is commutative or something.
Proof
[math]\implies[/math]
[math]x\in A\cap B\implies x\in A\text{ and }x\in B\implies x\in B\text{ and }x\in A\implies x\in B\cap A[/math], thus by the implies and subset relation we see [math]A\cap B\subset B\cap A[/math]
[math]\impliedby[/math]
By the exact same procedure we see [math]B\cap A\subset A\cap B[/math]
Thus we conclude [math]A\cap B=B\cap A[/math]