Difference between revisions of "Product topology"
From Maths
m (Reverted edits by JessicaBelinda133 (talk) to last revision by Alec) |
(Not finished) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | : '''Note: '''{{Note|Very often confused with the [[Box topology]] see [[Product vs box topology]] for details}} | |
− | + | {{Extra Maths}}__TOC__ | |
+ | ==Definition== | ||
+ | Given an arbitrary collection of [[Indexing set|indexed]] {{M|(X_\alpha,\mathcal{J}_\alpha)_{\alpha\in I} }} [[Topological space|topological spaces]], we define the '''product topology''' as follows: | ||
+ | * Let {{M|1=X:=\prod_{\alpha\in I}X_\alpha}} be a set imbued with the [[Topological space|topology]] generated by the [[Basis (topology)|basis]]: | ||
+ | * {{M|1=\mathcal{B}=\left\{\prod_{\alpha\in I}U_\alpha\Big\vert\ \forall\alpha\in I[U_\alpha\in\mathcal{J}_\alpha]\wedge\exists n\in\mathbb{N}[\vert\{U_\alpha\vert U_\alpha\ne X_\alpha\}\vert=n]\right\} }} | ||
+ | ** That is to say the basis set contains all the products of open sets where the product has a finite number of elements that are not the entirety of their space. | ||
+ | ** {{Yellow Note|For the sake of contrast, the [[Box topology]] has this definition for a basis:<br/><nowiki> | ||
+ | </nowiki>{{M|1=\mathcal{B}_\text{box}=\left\{\prod_{\alpha\in I}U_\alpha\Big\vert\ \forall\alpha\in I[U_\alpha\in\mathcal{J}_\alpha]\right\} }} - the product of any collection of open sets}} | ||
+ | * Note that in the case of a finite number of spaces, say {{M|1=(X_i,\mathcal{J}_i)_{i=1}^n}} then the topology on {{M|1=\prod_{i=1}^nX_i}} is generated by the basis: | ||
+ | ** {{M|1=\mathcal{B}_\text{finite}=\left\{\prod^n_{i=1}U_i\Big\vert\ \forall i\in\{1,2,\ldots,n\}[U_i\in\mathcal{J}_i]\right\} }} (that is to say the box/product topologies agree) | ||
− | <math> | + | ==Characteristic property== |
− | + | {{Yellow Note|Here {{M|p_i}} denotes the ''[[canonical projection]]'', sometimes {{M|\pi_i}} is used - I avoid using {{M|\pi}} because it is too similar to {{M|\prod}} (at least with my handwriting) - I have seen books using both of these conventions}} | |
− | + | {{Todo|Finish off}} | |
− | {{ | + | {| class="wikitable" border="1" |
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! <math>\begin{xy} | ||
+ | \xymatrix{ | ||
+ | & \prod_{\beta\in I}X_\beta \ar[d]^{p_i} \\ | ||
+ | Y \ar[ur]^f \ar[r]_{f_i} & X_i | ||
+ | }\end{xy} </math> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | (Commutes {{M|\forall \alpha\in I}}) | ||
+ | |} | ||
{{Definition|Topology}} | {{Definition|Topology}} |
Revision as of 19:51, 11 October 2015
- Note: Very often confused with the Box topology see Product vs box topology for details
Contents
Definition
Given an arbitrary collection of indexed [ilmath](X_\alpha,\mathcal{J}_\alpha)_{\alpha\in I} [/ilmath] topological spaces, we define the product topology as follows:
- Let [ilmath]X:=\prod_{\alpha\in I}X_\alpha[/ilmath] be a set imbued with the topology generated by the basis:
- [ilmath]\mathcal{B}=\left\{\prod_{\alpha\in I}U_\alpha\Big\vert\ \forall\alpha\in I[U_\alpha\in\mathcal{J}_\alpha]\wedge\exists n\in\mathbb{N}[\vert\{U_\alpha\vert U_\alpha\ne X_\alpha\}\vert=n]\right\}[/ilmath]
- That is to say the basis set contains all the products of open sets where the product has a finite number of elements that are not the entirety of their space.
- For the sake of contrast, the Box topology has this definition for a basis:
[ilmath]\mathcal{B}_\text{box}=\left\{\prod_{\alpha\in I}U_\alpha\Big\vert\ \forall\alpha\in I[U_\alpha\in\mathcal{J}_\alpha]\right\}[/ilmath] - the product of any collection of open sets
- Note that in the case of a finite number of spaces, say [ilmath](X_i,\mathcal{J}_i)_{i=1}^n[/ilmath] then the topology on [ilmath]\prod_{i=1}^nX_i[/ilmath] is generated by the basis:
- [ilmath]\mathcal{B}_\text{finite}=\left\{\prod^n_{i=1}U_i\Big\vert\ \forall i\in\{1,2,\ldots,n\}[U_i\in\mathcal{J}_i]\right\}[/ilmath] (that is to say the box/product topologies agree)
Characteristic property
Here [ilmath]p_i[/ilmath] denotes the canonical projection, sometimes [ilmath]\pi_i[/ilmath] is used - I avoid using [ilmath]\pi[/ilmath] because it is too similar to [ilmath]\prod[/ilmath] (at least with my handwriting) - I have seen books using both of these conventions
TODO: Finish off
[math]\begin{xy} \xymatrix{ & \prod_{\beta\in I}X_\beta \ar[d]^{p_i} \\ Y \ar[ur]^f \ar[r]_{f_i} & X_i }\end{xy} [/math] |
---|
(Commutes [ilmath]\forall \alpha\in I[/ilmath]) |