Difference between revisions of "Integral domain"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m (No idea what todo note was about)
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Requires references|This page needs an update to the modern style of the site, it was also created largely as a stub page}}
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 
Given a [[Ring|ring]] {{M|(D,+,\times)}}, it is called an ''integral domain''<ref name="FOAA">Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra - An Expanded Version - Neal H. McCoy</ref> if it is:
 
Given a [[Ring|ring]] {{M|(D,+,\times)}}, it is called an ''integral domain''<ref name="FOAA">Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra - An Expanded Version - Neal H. McCoy</ref> if it is:
Line 30: Line 31:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
+
{{Ring theory navbox}}
{{Definition|Abstract Algebra}}
+
{{Definition|Abstract Algebra|Ring Theory}}
 +
[[Category:Types of ring]]

Latest revision as of 11:09, 20 February 2016

(Unknown grade)
This page requires references, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable, it just means that the author of the page doesn't have a book to hand, or remember the book to find it, which would have been a suitable reference.
The message provided is:
This page needs an update to the modern style of the site, it was also created largely as a stub page

Definition

Given a ring [ilmath](D,+,\times)[/ilmath], it is called an integral domain[1] if it is:

  • A commutative ring, that is: [math]\forall x,y\in D[xy=yx][/math]
  • Contains no non-zero divisors of zero
    • An element [ilmath]a[/ilmath] of a ring [ilmath]R[/ilmath] is said to be a divisor of zero in [ilmath]R[/ilmath] if:
      • [math]\exists c\in R[c\ne e_+\wedge ac=e_+][/math] or if (by writing [ilmath]e_+[/ilmath] as [ilmath]0[/ilmath] we can say: [math]\exists c\in R[c\ne 0\wedge ac=0][/math])
      • [math]\exists d\in R[d\ne e_+\wedge da=e_+][/math] (by writing [ilmath]e_+[/ilmath] as [ilmath]0[/ilmath] we can say: [math]\exists d\in R[d\ne 0\wedge da=0][/math])
      • We can write this as: [math]\exists c\in R[c\ne 0\wedge(ac=0\vee ca=0)][/math]

As the integral domain is commutative we don't need both [ilmath]ac[/ilmath] and [ilmath]ca[/ilmath].

Shorter definition

We can restate this as[2] a ring [ilmath]D[/ilmath] is an integral domain if:

  • [math]\forall x,y\in D[xy=yx][/math]
  • [math]\forall a,b\in D[(a\ne 0,b\ne 0)\implies(ab\ne 0)][/math]

Example of a ring that isn't an integral domain

Consider the ring [ilmath]\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z} [/ilmath], the ring of integers modulo 6, notice that [ilmath][2][3]=[6]=[0]=e_+[/ilmath].

This means both [ilmath][2][/ilmath] and [ilmath][3][/ilmath] are non-zero divisors of zero.

Examples of rings that are integral domains

  • The integers
  • [ilmath]\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} [/ilmath] where [ilmath]p[/ilmath] is prime

See next

See also


References

  1. Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra - An Expanded Version - Neal H. McCoy
  2. My (Alec's) own work

Template:Ring theory navbox