Difference between revisions of "Inductive set"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Stub page|grade=A*|msg=Needs another reference}} __TOC__ ==Definition== Let {{M|I}} be a set. We call {{M|I}} an ''inductive set'' if{{rITSTHJ}} both of the following pr...")
 
m (Definition)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
{{Definition|Set Theory}}

Revision as of 15:47, 3 February 2017

Stub grade: A*
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Needs another reference

Definition

Let I be a set. We call I an inductive set if[1] both of the following properties hold:

  1. I - often written 0I as 0 is represented by the - and
  2. n[nIS(n)I] - often written as "if nI then (n+1)I"

Caveat:Note that this certainly describes the natural numbers as we require I, so they're in there. The problem is that rule 2 seems to require that for every element n that n{n} is in there too. - this seems to be intended[2]

References

  1. Jump up Introduction To Set Theory - Third Edition, Revised and Expanded - Karel Hrbacek & Thomas Jech
  2. Jump up Set Theory - Thomas Jech - Third millennium edition, revised and expanded