Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monotonic"
From Maths
(→Isotonic: new section) |
(→Isotonic: what do you mean?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
For one relation to be isotonic BUT NOT the dual you would need a way to separate them. Isotonic is a word I've read though. But "isotonic: monotonic but where the relations are visually facing the same way" is not how I want to define it! Will look into later [[User:Alec|Alec]] ([[User talk:Alec|talk]]) 08:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | For one relation to be isotonic BUT NOT the dual you would need a way to separate them. Isotonic is a word I've read though. But "isotonic: monotonic but where the relations are visually facing the same way" is not how I want to define it! Will look into later [[User:Alec|Alec]] ([[User talk:Alec|talk]]) 08:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oops, I fail to get your hint. Quite unclear, what do you mean? [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 09:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:01, 9 April 2016
Isotonic
For one relation to be isotonic BUT NOT the dual you would need a way to separate them. Isotonic is a word I've read though. But "isotonic: monotonic but where the relations are visually facing the same way" is not how I want to define it! Will look into later Alec (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
