Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monotonic"
From Maths
(→Isotonic: what do you mean?) |
("order preserving" versus "order inverting"?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Oops, I fail to get your hint. Quite unclear, what do you mean? [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 09:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | :Oops, I fail to get your hint. Quite unclear, what do you mean? [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 09:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Another option: "order preserving" versus "order inverting". Not sure whether it is in use. [[User:Boris|Boris]] ([[User talk:Boris|talk]]) 09:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:06, 9 April 2016
Isotonic
For one relation to be isotonic BUT NOT the dual you would need a way to separate them. Isotonic is a word I've read though. But "isotonic: monotonic but where the relations are visually facing the same way" is not how I want to define it! Will look into later Alec (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
