Difference between revisions of "Urysohn's lemma"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Stub page|grade=B}} ==Statement== Let {{Top.|X|J}} be a ''normal'' topological space, let {{M|E}} and {{M|F}} be a pair of ''disjoint''...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 00:21, 4 May 2016

Stub grade: B
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.

Statement

Let [ilmath](X,\mathcal{ J })[/ilmath] be a normal topological space, let [ilmath]E[/ilmath] and [ilmath]F[/ilmath] be a pair of disjoint closed sets of [ilmath]X[/ilmath], then[1]:

  • there exists a continuous function, [ilmath]f:X\rightarrow [0,1]\subset\mathbb{R} [/ilmath] such that [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is [ilmath]0[/ilmath] on [ilmath]E[/ilmath] and [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is [ilmath]1[/ilmath] on [ilmath]F[/ilmath]

TODO: Get a picture - the idea of this theorem is brilliant, once you see it!


Proof

Grade: C
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Not an easy proof

References

  1. Introduction to Topology - Theodore W. Gamelin & Robert Everist Greene