Difference between revisions of "Integral domain"
From Maths
(Created page with "==Definition== Given a ring {{M|(D,+,\times)}}, it is called an ''integral domain''<ref name="FOAA">Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra - An Expanded Version - Neal H. M...") |
m |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
{{Definition|Abstract Algebra}} | {{Definition|Abstract Algebra}} | ||
+ | {{Todo|Cancellation laws of multiplication in a ring, page 54 Neal H McCoy - Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra is a good place to start}} |
Revision as of 05:50, 9 June 2015
Contents
[hide]Definition
Given a ring (D,+,×), it is called an integral domain[1] if it is:
- A commutative ring, that is: ∀x,y∈D[xy=yx]
- Contains no non-zero divisors of zero
- An element a of a ring R is said to be a divisor of zero in R if:
- ∃c∈R[c≠e+∧ac=e+] or if (by writing e+ as 0 we can say: ∃c∈R[c≠0∧ac=0])
- ∃d∈R[d≠e+∧da=e+] (by writing e+ as 0 we can say: ∃d∈R[d≠0∧da=0])
- We can write this as: ∃c∈R[c≠0∧(ac=0∨ca=0)]
- An element a of a ring R is said to be a divisor of zero in R if:
As the integral domain is commutative we don't need both ac and ca.
Shorter definition
We can restate this as[2] a ring D is an integral domain if:
- ∀x,y∈D[xy=yx]
- ∀a,b∈D[(a≠0,b≠0)⟹(ab≠0)]
Example of a ring that isn't an integral domain
Consider the ring Z/6Z, the ring of integers modulo 6, notice that [2][3]=[6]=[0]=e+.
This means both [2] and [3] are non-zero divisors of zero.
Examples of rings that are integral domains
- The integers
- Z/pZ where p is prime
See next
See also
References
- Jump up ↑ Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra - An Expanded Version - Neal H. McCoy
- Jump up ↑ My (Alec's) own work
TODO: Cancellation laws of multiplication in a ring, page 54 Neal H McCoy - Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra is a good place to start