Exercises:Measure Theory - 2016 - 1/Section B/Problem 1
From Maths
Contents
Section B
Problem B1
Part i)
Suppose that An are algebras of sets satisfying An⊂An+1. Show that ⋃n∈NAn is an algebra.
- Caution:Is ⊂ or ⊆ desired?
Solution
- Closed under complementation: ∀A∈⋃n∈NAn[A∁∈⋃n∈NAn]
- Let A∈⋃n∈NAn be given.
- By definition of union: [A∈⋃n∈NAn]⟺[∃i∈N[A∈Ai]]
- As Ai is an algebra of sets itself:
- A∁∈Ai
- Thus A∁∈⋃n∈NAn
- As Ai is an algebra of sets itself:
- By definition of union: [A∈⋃n∈NAn]⟺[∃i∈N[A∈Ai]]
- Since A∈⋃n∈NAn was arbitrary, we have shown this for all such A, thus ⋃n∈NAn is closed under complementation.
- Let A∈⋃n∈NAn be given.
- Closed under union: ∀A,B∈⋃n∈NAn[A∪B∈⋃n∈NAn]
- Let A,B∈⋃n∈NAn be given.
- By definition of union we see:
- ∃i∈N[A∈Ai] and
- ∃j∈N[B∈Aj]
- Define k:=Max({i,j})
- Now Ai⊆Ak and Aj⊆Ak (at least one of these will be strict equality, it matters not which)
- Thus A,B∈Ak
- As Ak is an algebra of sets:
- ∀C,D∈Ak[C∪D∈Ak]
- Thus A∪B∈Ak
- So A∪B∈⋃n∈NAn (explicitly, ∃h∈N[A∪B∈Ah] - namely choosing h to be k as we have defined it, and we have this if and only if A∪B is in the union, by the definition of union)
- By definition of union we see:
- Since A,B∈⋃n∈NAn were arbitrary we have shown this for all such A and B. As required.
- Let A,B∈⋃n∈NAn be given.
Part ii)
Check that if the An are all sigma-algebras that their union need not be a sigma-algebra.
Is a countable union of sigma-algebras (whether monotonic or not) an algebra?
- Hint: Try considering the set of all positive integers, Z≥1 with its sigma-algebras An:=σ(Cn) where Cn:=P({1,2,…,n}) where {1,2,…,n}⊂N and P denotes the power set
Check that if B1 and B2 are sigma-algebras that their union need not be an algebra of sets
Solution
Suppose all the Ais are sigma-algebras now, and suppose that An⊂An+1 still holds. We wish to show that their union, ⋃n∈NAn is not a sigma-algebra.
- Our first guess will be that the σ-∪-closed property does not hold. That is:
- ¬[∀(An)n∈N⊆⋃n∈NAn[⋃n∈NAn∈⋃n∈NAn]] which is equivalent to (in that ⟺ or if and only if):
- ∃(An)n∈N⊆⋃n∈NAn[⋃n∈NAn∉⋃n∈NAn] (Caution:Things look very similar here! Read with care!)
- As before: ⋃n∈NAn∉⋃n∈NAn⟺¬(∃k∈N[⋃n∈NAn∈Ak]) ⟺ ∀k∈N[⋃n∈NAn∉Ak]
- So we need to find a (An)∞n=1⊆⋃n∈NAn such that ∀k∈N[⋃n∈NAn∉Ak]
- As An⊂An+1 we know ∃A∈An+1[A∉An], as they're proper subsets of each other.
- Thus, define An:=Xn where Xn∈An+1 and Xn∉An (which we have just shown to exist).
- Now we must prove ∀k∈N[⋃n∈NAn∉Ak]
- Let k∈N be given.
- Notice Ak+1⊆⋃n∈NAn (it is probably actually ⊂ but we do not require this and I cannot be bothered to prove they're not equal) as each element participating in a union is a subset of the union
- Saving work. Better to use instance (this is what the hint is for) See new notepad.
- Notice Ak+1⊆⋃n∈NAn (it is probably actually ⊂ but we do not require this and I cannot be bothered to prove they're not equal) as each element participating in a union is a subset of the union
- Let k∈N be given.
- Now we must prove ∀k∈N[⋃n∈NAn∉Ak]
- Thus, define An:=Xn where Xn∈An+1 and Xn∉An (which we have just shown to exist).
- As An⊂An+1 we know ∃A∈An+1[A∉An], as they're proper subsets of each other.
- So we need to find a (An)∞n=1⊆⋃n∈NAn such that ∀k∈N[⋃n∈NAn∉Ak]
Notes
References