Talk:Passing to the quotient (function)/Induced is surjective iff function is surjective
From Maths
Contents
Reminder
Diagram |
---|
- [ilmath]\forall a,b\in X\left[\big(w(a)=w(b)\big)\implies\big(f(a)=f(b)\big)\right][/ilmath]
then we may "factor [ilmath]f[/ilmath] through [ilmath]w[/ilmath] to yield:
- A function, [ilmath]\bar{f}:W\rightarrow Y[/ilmath] well defined by [ilmath]\bar{f}:w\mapsto f(w^{-1}(w))[/ilmath] such that:
- [ilmath]f=\bar{f}\circ w[/ilmath]
- Furthermore, if [ilmath]w:X\rightarrow W[/ilmath] is surjective then the induced [ilmath]\bar{f}:W\rightarrow Y[/ilmath] is unique].
The [ilmath]w[/ilmath] and [ilmath]W[/ilmath] represent "whatever", anything.
Claim
- If [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is surjective then [ilmath]\bar{f} [/ilmath] is surjective
Utility
- Useful property to have when factoring, isn't difficult, can be applied to many things (especially anything involving isomorphisms)
- Motivated by the first group isomorphism theorem, in fact I'm writing this for use there.
Proof
Suppose [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is surjective. We wish to show that [ilmath]\bar{f} [/ilmath] is too.
- Note: [ilmath]f[/ilmath] is surjective means:
- [ilmath]\forall y\in Y\exists x\in X[f(x)=y][/ilmath]
We may now begin the proof. We wish to show [ilmath]\forall y\in Y\exists a\in W[\bar{f}(a)=y][/ilmath]
- Let [ilmath]y\in Y[/ilmath] be given.
- By hypothesis: [ilmath]\exists x\in X[f(x)=y][/ilmath]
- Pick [ilmath]x\in X[/ilmath] such that [ilmath]f(x)=y[/ilmath].
- Note that by the other part of the hypothesis:
- [ilmath]f=\bar{f}\circ w[/ilmath] so
- [ilmath]y=f(x)=(\bar{f}\circ w)(x)=\bar{f}(w(x))[/ilmath]
- Note that by the other part of the hypothesis:
- Choose [ilmath]a\in W[/ilmath] by [ilmath]a:=w(x)[/ilmath]
- Now [ilmath]\bar{f}(a)=y[/ilmath]
- This completes the proof.
Notes
On paper I've been rather unhappy with this proof, I actually tried to go by contradiction, starting with:
- [ilmath]\exists y\in Y\forall a\in W[\bar{f}(a)\ne y][/ilmath]
And hoping to reach a contradiction, but I didn't really "contradict". Obviously I got to "but we see [ilmath]\bar{f} [/ilmath] is the negation of (not surjective), but it didn't seem to have a contradiction in it as such.
I'm not sure what I was unhappy about though!