Difference between revisions of "Norm"
m |
m (Adding uniform continuity property) |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{:Norm/Heading}} | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | __TOC__ | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
− | A norm on a [[Vector space|vector space]] {{M|(V,F)}} is a function <math>\|\cdot\|:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> such that: | + | A norm on a [[Vector space|vector space]] {{M|(V,F)}} (where {{M|F}} is either {{M|\mathbb{R} }} or {{M|\mathbb{C} }}) is a function <math>\|\cdot\|:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> such that{{rAPIKM}}<ref name="FA">Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici</ref><ref name="FAAGI">Functional Analysis - A Gentle Introduction - Volume 1, by Dzung Minh Ha</ref>{{RRAAAHS}}<sup>{{Highlight|See warning notes:<ref group="Note">A lot of books, including the brilliant [[Books:Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin|Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin]] referenced here state ''explicitly'' that it is possible for {{M|\Vert\cdot,\cdot\Vert:V\rightarrow\mathbb{C} }} they are wrong. I assure you that it is {{M|\Vert\cdot\Vert:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} }}. Other than this the references are valid, note that this is 'obvious' as if the image of {{M|\Vert\cdot\Vert}} could be in {{M|\mathbb{C} }} then the {{M|\Vert x\Vert\ge 0}} would make no sense. What ordering would you use? The [[canonical]] ordering used for the product of 2 spaces ({{M|\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R} }} in this case) is the [[Lexicographic ordering]] which would put {{M|1+1j\le 1+1000j}}!</ref><ref group="Note">The other mistake books make is saying explicitly that the [[field of a vector space]] needs to be {{M|\mathbb{R} }}, it may commonly be {{M|\mathbb{R} }} but it does not ''need'' to be {{M|\mathbb{R} }}</ref>}}</sup>: |
# <math>\forall x\in V\ \|x\|\ge 0</math> | # <math>\forall x\in V\ \|x\|\ge 0</math> | ||
# <math>\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math> | # <math>\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math> | ||
Line 11: | Line 9: | ||
# <math>\forall x,y\in V\ \|x+y\|\le\|x\|+\|y\|</math> - a form of the [[Triangle inequality|triangle inequality]] | # <math>\forall x,y\in V\ \|x+y\|\le\|x\|+\|y\|</math> - a form of the [[Triangle inequality|triangle inequality]] | ||
− | Often parts 1 and 2 are combined into the statement | + | Often parts 1 and 2 are combined into the statement: |
* <math>\|x\|\ge 0\text{ and }\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math> so only 3 requirements will be stated. | * <math>\|x\|\ge 0\text{ and }\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math> so only 3 requirements will be stated. | ||
− | I don't like this | + | I don't like this (inline with the [[Doctrine of monotonic definition]]) |
+ | ==Properties== | ||
+ | * [[The norm of a space is a uniformly continuous map with respect to the topology it induces]] - {{M|\Vert\cdot\Vert:X\rightarrow\mathbb{R} }} is a [[uniformly continuous]] map. | ||
+ | ==Terminology== | ||
+ | Such a vector space equipped with such a function is called a [[Normed space|normed space]]<ref name="APIKM"/> | ||
+ | ==Relation to various [[subtypes of topological spaces]]== | ||
+ | The reader should note that: | ||
+ | * Every [[inner product]] induces a ''norm'' and | ||
+ | * Every ''norm'' induces a [[metric]] | ||
+ | These are outlined below | ||
+ | ===Relation to [[inner product]]=== | ||
+ | Every [[inner product]] {{M|\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle:V\times V\rightarrow(\mathbb{R}\text{ or }\mathbb{C})}} induces a ''norm'' given by: | ||
+ | * {{M|1=\Vert x\Vert:=\sqrt{\langle x,x\rangle} }} | ||
+ | {{Todo|see [[inner product#Norm induced by|inner product (norm induced by)]] for more details, on that page is a proof that {{M|\langle x,x\rangle\ge 0}}, this needs its own page with a proof.}} | ||
− | == | + | ===Metric induced by a norm=== |
− | To get a [[Metric space|metric space]] from a norm simply define <math>d(x,y)=\|x-y\|</math> | + | To get a [[Metric space|metric space]] from a norm simply define<ref name="FA"/><ref name="APIKM"/>: |
− | + | * <math>d(x,y):=\|x-y\|</math> | |
− | + | (See [[Subtypes of topological spaces]] for more information, this relationship is very important in [[Functional analysis]]) | |
+ | {{Todo|Move to its own page and do a proof (trivial)}} | ||
==Weaker and stronger norms== | ==Weaker and stronger norms== | ||
Line 28: | Line 40: | ||
Given two norms <math>\|\cdot\|_1</math> and <math>\|\cdot\|_2</math> on a [[Vector space|vector space]] {{M|V}} we say they are equivalent if: | Given two norms <math>\|\cdot\|_1</math> and <math>\|\cdot\|_2</math> on a [[Vector space|vector space]] {{M|V}} we say they are equivalent if: | ||
− | <math>\exists c,C\in\mathbb{R}\ \forall x\in V:\ c\|x\|_1\le\|x\|_2\le C\|x\|_1</math> | + | <math>\exists c,C\in\mathbb{R}\text{ with }c,C>0\ \forall x\in V:\ c\|x\|_1\le\|x\|_2\le C\|x\|_1</math> |
− | + | {{Begin Theorem}} | |
+ | Theorem: This is an [[Equivalence relation]] - so we may write this as <math>\|\cdot\|_1\sim\|\cdot\|_2</math> | ||
+ | {{Begin Proof}} | ||
{{Todo|proof}} | {{Todo|proof}} | ||
− | + | {{End Proof}} | |
+ | {{End Theorem}} | ||
Note also that if <math>\|\cdot\|_1</math> is both weaker and stronger than <math>\|\cdot\|_2</math> they are equivalent | Note also that if <math>\|\cdot\|_1</math> is both weaker and stronger than <math>\|\cdot\|_2</math> they are equivalent | ||
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
*Any two norms on <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math> are equivalent | *Any two norms on <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math> are equivalent | ||
*The norms <math>\|\cdot\|_{L^1}</math> and <math>\|\cdot\|_\infty</math> on <math>\mathcal{C}([0,1],\mathbb{R})</math> are not equivalent. | *The norms <math>\|\cdot\|_{L^1}</math> and <math>\|\cdot\|_\infty</math> on <math>\mathcal{C}([0,1],\mathbb{R})</math> are not equivalent. | ||
− | |||
==Common norms== | ==Common norms== | ||
Line 54: | Line 68: | ||
| 2-norm | | 2-norm | ||
|<math>\|x\|_2=\sqrt{\sum^n_{i=1}x_i^2}</math> | |<math>\|x\|_2=\sqrt{\sum^n_{i=1}x_i^2}</math> | ||
− | | Also known as the Euclidean norm | + | | Also known as the [[Euclidean norm]] - it's just a special case of the p-norm. |
|- | |- | ||
| p-norm | | p-norm | ||
Line 62: | Line 76: | ||
| <math>\infty-</math>norm | | <math>\infty-</math>norm | ||
|<math>\|x\|_\infty=\sup(\{x_i\}_{i=1}^n)</math> | |<math>\|x\|_\infty=\sup(\{x_i\}_{i=1}^n)</math> | ||
− | |Also called | + | |Also called sup-norm<br/> |
|- | |- | ||
!colspan="3"|Norms on <math>\mathcal{C}([0,1],\mathbb{R})</math> | !colspan="3"|Norms on <math>\mathcal{C}([0,1],\mathbb{R})</math> | ||
Line 87: | Line 101: | ||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
* [[Euclidean norm]] | * [[Euclidean norm]] | ||
− | {{Definition|Linear Algebra}} | + | |
+ | ==Notes== | ||
+ | <references group="Note"/> | ||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | <references/> | ||
+ | {{Normed and Banach spaces navbox}} | ||
+ | {{Metric spaces navbox}} | ||
+ | {{Topology navbox}} | ||
+ | {{Definition|Linear Algebra|Topology|Metric Space|Functional Analysis}} | ||
+ | [[Category:Exemplary pages]] | ||
+ | [[Category:First-year friendly]] |
Latest revision as of 20:33, 9 April 2017
Norm | |
∥⋅∥:V→R≥0 Where V is a vector space over the field R or C | |
relation to other topological spaces | |
---|---|
is a | |
contains all | |
Related objects | |
Induced metric |
|
Induced by inner product |
|
Contents
[hide]Definition
A norm on a vector space (V,F) (where F is either R or C) is a function ∥⋅∥:V→R such that[1][2][3][4]See warning notes:[Note 1][Note 2]:
- ∀x∈V ∥x∥≥0
- ∥x∥=0⟺x=0
- ∀λ∈F,x∈V ∥λx∥=|λ|∥x∥ where |⋅| denotes absolute value
- ∀x,y∈V ∥x+y∥≤∥x∥+∥y∥ - a form of the triangle inequality
Often parts 1 and 2 are combined into the statement:
- ∥x∥≥0 and ∥x∥=0⟺x=0 so only 3 requirements will be stated.
I don't like this (inline with the Doctrine of monotonic definition)
Properties
- The norm of a space is a uniformly continuous map with respect to the topology it induces - ∥⋅∥:X→R is a uniformly continuous map.
Terminology
Such a vector space equipped with such a function is called a normed space[1]
Relation to various subtypes of topological spaces
The reader should note that:
- Every inner product induces a norm and
- Every norm induces a metric
These are outlined below
Relation to inner product
Every inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩:V×V→(R or C) induces a norm given by:
- ∥x∥:=√⟨x,x⟩
TODO: see inner product (norm induced by) for more details, on that page is a proof that ⟨x,x⟩≥0, this needs its own page with a proof.
Metric induced by a norm
To get a metric space from a norm simply define[2][1]:
- d(x,y):=∥x−y∥
(See Subtypes of topological spaces for more information, this relationship is very important in Functional analysis)
TODO: Move to its own page and do a proof (trivial)
Weaker and stronger norms
Given a norm ∥⋅∥1 and another ∥⋅∥2 we say:
- ∥⋅∥1 is weaker than ∥⋅∥2 if ∃C>0∀x∈V such that ∥x∥1≤C∥x∥2
- ∥⋅∥2 is stronger than ∥⋅∥1 in this case
Equivalence of norms
Given two norms ∥⋅∥1 and ∥⋅∥2 on a vector space V we say they are equivalent if:
∃c,C∈R with c,C>0 ∀x∈V: c∥x∥1≤∥x∥2≤C∥x∥1
Theorem: This is an Equivalence relation - so we may write this as ∥⋅∥1∼∥⋅∥2
Note also that if ∥⋅∥1 is both weaker and stronger than ∥⋅∥2 they are equivalent
Examples
- Any two norms on Rn are equivalent
- The norms ∥⋅∥L1 and ∥⋅∥∞ on C([0,1],R) are not equivalent.
Common norms
Name | Norm | Notes |
---|---|---|
Norms on Rn | ||
1-norm | ∥x∥1=n∑i=1|xi| | it's just a special case of the p-norm. |
2-norm | ∥x∥2=√n∑i=1x2i | Also known as the Euclidean norm - it's just a special case of the p-norm. |
p-norm | ∥x∥p=(n∑i=1|xi|p)1p | (I use this notation because it can be easy to forget the p in p√) |
∞−norm | ∥x∥∞=sup({xi}ni=1) | Also called sup-norm |
Norms on C([0,1],R) | ||
∥⋅∥Lp | ∥f∥Lp=(∫10|f(x)|pdx)1p | NOTE be careful extending to interval [a,b] as proof it is a norm relies on having a unit measure |
∞−norm | ∥f∥∞=supx∈[0,1](|f(x)|) | Following the same spirit as the ∞−norm on Rn |
∥⋅∥Ck | ∥f∥Ck=k∑i=1supx∈[0,1](|f(i)|) | here f(k) denotes the kth derivative. |
Induced norms | ||
Pullback norm | ∥⋅∥U | For a linear isomorphism L:U→V where V is a normed vector space |
Examples
Notes
- Jump up ↑ A lot of books, including the brilliant Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin referenced here state explicitly that it is possible for ∥⋅,⋅∥:V→C they are wrong. I assure you that it is ∥⋅∥:V→R≥0. Other than this the references are valid, note that this is 'obvious' as if the image of ∥⋅∥ could be in C then the ∥x∥≥0 would make no sense. What ordering would you use? The canonical ordering used for the product of 2 spaces (R×R in this case) is the Lexicographic ordering which would put 1+1j≤1+1000j!
- Jump up ↑ The other mistake books make is saying explicitly that the field of a vector space needs to be R, it may commonly be R but it does not need to be R
References
- ↑ Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin
- ↑ Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici
- Jump up ↑ Functional Analysis - A Gentle Introduction - Volume 1, by Dzung Minh Ha
- Jump up ↑ Real and Abstract Analysis - Edwin Hewitt & Karl Stromberg
|
|
|