Subspace topology

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
Grade: A
This page is currently being refactored (along with many others)
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. It just means the page doesn't conform to the style of the site (usually due to age) or a better way of presenting the information has been discovered.
The message provided is:
Needed urgently, ready to plough on with it now though!

Definition

Let (X,J) be a topological space and let SP(X)[Note 1] be given. We can construct a new topological space, (S,JS) where the topology JS is known as "the subspace topology on S"[1] (AKA: relative topology on S[1]) and is defined as follows:

  • JS:={US | UJ} - the open sets of (S,JS) are precisely the intersection of open sets of (X,J) with S

Alternatively:

  • Claim 2: UP(S)[UJSVJ[U=SV]][1]

We get with this a map, called the canonical injection of the subspace topology, often denoted iS:SX or ιS:SX given by iS:ss. This is an example of an inclusion map, and it is continuous.

Note that if one proves iS is continuous then the characteristic property boils down to little more than the composition of continuous maps is continuous, if one proves the characteristic property first, then continuity of iS comes from it as a corollary

Terminology

  • Let UP(S) be given. For clarity rather than saying U is open, or U is closed (which is surprisingly ambiguous when using subspaces) we instead say:
    1. U is relatively open[1] - indicating we mean open in the subspace, or
    2. U is relatively closed[1] - indicating we mean closed in the subspace

TODO: Closed and open subspace terminology, For example if SP(X) is closed with respect to the topology J on X, then we call S imbued with the subspace topology a closed subspace


Characteristic property

Diagram
Let (X,J) be a topological space and let (S,JS) be any subspace of (X,J)[Note 2]. The characteristic property of the subspace topology[1] is that:
  • Given any topological space (Y,K) and any map f:YS we have:
    • (f:YS is continuous)(iSf:YX is continuous)

Where iS:SX given by iS:ss is the canonical injection of the subspace topology (which is itself continuous)[Note 3]

Proof of claims

Claim 1: JS is a topology

Grade: C
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Really easy, hence low importance

This proof has been marked as an page requiring an easy proof

Claim 2: Equivalent formulation of the relatively open sets

Grade: C
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Really easy, hence low importance

This proof has been marked as an page requiring an easy proof

See next


TODO: Theorems and propositions involving subspaces


See also


TODO: Link to more things


Notes

  1. Jump up Recall P(X) denotes the power set of X and SP(X)SX, so it's another way of saying let S be a subset of X, possibly empty, possibly equal to X itself
  2. Jump up This means SP(X), or SX of course
  3. Jump up This leads to two ways to prove the statement:
    1. If we show iS:SX is continuous, then we can use the composition of continuous maps is continuous to show if f continuous then so is iSf
    2. We can show the property the "long way" and then show iS:SX is continuous as a corollary

References

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Introduction to Topological Manifolds - John M. Lee

OLD PAGE

Definition

Given a topological space (X,J) and given a YX (Y is a subset of X) we define the subspace topology as follows:[1]

  • (Y,K) is a topological space where the open sets, K, are given by K:={YV| VJ}

We may say any one of:

  1. Let Y be a subspace of X
  2. Let Y be a subspace of (X,J)

and it is taken implicitly to mean Y is considered as a topological space with the subspace topology inherited from (X,J)

Proof of claims

[Expand]

Claim 1: The subspace topology is indeed a topology


Terminology

  • A closed subspace (of X) is a subset of X which is closed in X and is imbued with the subspace topology
  • A open subspace (of X) is a subset of X which is open in X and is imbued with the subspace topology

TODO: Find reference


  • A set UX is open relative to Y (or relatively open if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace Y of X) if U is open in Y
    • This implies that UY[1]
  • A set UX is closed relative to Y (or relatively closed if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace Y of X) if U is closed in Y
    • This also implies that UY

Immediate theorems

[Expand]

Theorem: Let Y be a subspace of X, if U is open in Y and Y is open in X then U is open in X[1]


References

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Topology - Second Edition - Munkres