Subspace topology
The message provided is:
Contents
[hide]Definition
Let (X,J) be a topological space and let S∈P(X)[Note 1] be given. We can construct a new topological space, (S,JS) where the topology JS is known as "the subspace topology on S"[1] (AKA: relative topology on S[1]) and is defined as follows:
- JS:={U∩S | U∈J} - the open sets of (S,JS) are precisely the intersection of open sets of (X,J) with S
Alternatively:
- Claim 2: ∀U∈P(S)[U∈JS⟺∃V∈J[U=S∩V]][1]
We get with this a map, called the canonical injection of the subspace topology, often denoted iS:S→X or ιS:S→X given by iS:s↦s. This is an example of an inclusion map, and it is continuous.
Note that if one proves iS is continuous then the characteristic property boils down to little more than the composition of continuous maps is continuous, if one proves the characteristic property first, then continuity of iS comes from it as a corollary
Terminology
- Let U∈P(S) be given. For clarity rather than saying U is open, or U is closed (which is surprisingly ambiguous when using subspaces) we instead say:
- U is relatively open[1] - indicating we mean open in the subspace, or
- U is relatively closed[1] - indicating we mean closed in the subspace
TODO: Closed and open subspace terminology, For example if S∈P(X) is closed with respect to the topology J on X, then we call S imbued with the subspace topology a closed subspace
Characteristic property
- Given any topological space (Y,K) and any map f:Y→S we have:
- (f:Y→S is continuous)⟺(iS∘f:Y→X is continuous)
Where iS:S→X given by iS:s↦s is the canonical injection of the subspace topology (which is itself continuous)[Note 3]
Proof of claims
Claim 1: JS is a topology
The message provided is:
This proof has been marked as an page requiring an easy proof
Claim 2: Equivalent formulation of the relatively open sets
The message provided is:
This proof has been marked as an page requiring an easy proof
See next
TODO: Theorems and propositions involving subspaces
See also
TODO: Link to more things
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Recall P(X) denotes the power set of X and S∈P(X)⟺S⊆X, so it's another way of saying let S be a subset of X, possibly empty, possibly equal to X itself
- Jump up ↑ This means S∈P(X), or S⊆X of course
- Jump up ↑ This leads to two ways to prove the statement:
- If we show iS:S→X is continuous, then we can use the composition of continuous maps is continuous to show if f continuous then so is iS∘f
- We can show the property the "long way" and then show iS:S→X is continuous as a corollary
References
|
OLD PAGE
Definition
Given a topological space (X,J) and given a Y⊂X (Y is a subset of X) we define the subspace topology as follows:[1]
- (Y,K) is a topological space where the open sets, K, are given by K:={Y∩V| V∈J}
We may say any one of:
- Let Y be a subspace of X
- Let Y be a subspace of (X,J)
and it is taken implicitly to mean Y is considered as a topological space with the subspace topology inherited from (X,J)
Proof of claims
Claim 1: The subspace topology is indeed a topology
Terminology
- A closed subspace (of X) is a subset of X which is closed in X and is imbued with the subspace topology
- A open subspace (of X) is a subset of X which is open in X and is imbued with the subspace topology
TODO: Find reference
- A set U⊆X is open relative to Y (or relatively open if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace Y of X) if U is open in Y
- This implies that U⊆Y[1]
- A set U⊆X is closed relative to Y (or relatively closed if it is obvious we are talking about a subspace Y of X) if U is closed in Y
- This also implies that U⊆Y
Immediate theorems
Theorem: Let Y be a subspace of X, if U is open in Y and Y is open in X then U is open in X[1]
References
- ↑ Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Topology - Second Edition - Munkres