Difference between revisions of "Norm"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Common norms)
m (Adding uniform continuity property)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An understanding of a norm is needed to proceed to [[Linear isometry|linear isometries]]
+
{{:Norm/Heading}}
 
+
==Normed vector spaces==
+
A normed vector space is a [[Vector space|vector space]] equipped with a norm <math>\|\cdot\|_V</math>, it may be denoted <math>(V,\|\cdot\|_V,F)</math>
+
  
 +
__TOC__
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
A norm on a [[Vector space|vector space]] {{M|(V,F)}} is a function <math>\|\cdot\|:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> such that:
+
A norm on a [[Vector space|vector space]] {{M|(V,F)}} (where {{M|F}} is either {{M|\mathbb{R} }} or {{M|\mathbb{C} }}) is a function <math>\|\cdot\|:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> such that{{rAPIKM}}<ref name="FA">Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici</ref><ref name="FAAGI">Functional Analysis - A Gentle Introduction - Volume 1, by Dzung Minh Ha</ref>{{RRAAAHS}}<sup>{{Highlight|See warning notes:<ref group="Note">A lot of books, including the brilliant [[Books:Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin|Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin]] referenced here state ''explicitly'' that it is possible for {{M|\Vert\cdot,\cdot\Vert:V\rightarrow\mathbb{C} }} they are wrong. I assure you that it is {{M|\Vert\cdot\Vert:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\ge 0} }}. Other than this the references are valid, note that this is 'obvious' as if the image of {{M|\Vert\cdot\Vert}} could be in {{M|\mathbb{C} }} then the {{M|\Vert x\Vert\ge 0}} would make no sense. What ordering would you use? The [[canonical]] ordering used for the product of 2 spaces ({{M|\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R} }} in this case) is the [[Lexicographic ordering]] which would put {{M|1+1j\le 1+1000j}}!</ref><ref group="Note">The other mistake books make is saying explicitly that the [[field of a vector space]] needs to be {{M|\mathbb{R} }}, it may commonly be {{M|\mathbb{R} }} but it does not ''need'' to be {{M|\mathbb{R} }}</ref>}}</sup>:
 
# <math>\forall x\in V\ \|x\|\ge 0</math>
 
# <math>\forall x\in V\ \|x\|\ge 0</math>
 
# <math>\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math>
 
# <math>\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math>
Line 11: Line 9:
 
# <math>\forall x,y\in V\ \|x+y\|\le\|x\|+\|y\|</math> - a form of the [[Triangle inequality|triangle inequality]]
 
# <math>\forall x,y\in V\ \|x+y\|\le\|x\|+\|y\|</math> - a form of the [[Triangle inequality|triangle inequality]]
  
Often parts 1 and 2 are combined into the statement
+
Often parts 1 and 2 are combined into the statement:
 
* <math>\|x\|\ge 0\text{ and }\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math> so only 3 requirements will be stated.
 
* <math>\|x\|\ge 0\text{ and }\|x\|=0\iff x=0</math> so only 3 requirements will be stated.
I don't like this
+
I don't like this (inline with the [[Doctrine of monotonic definition]])
 
+
==Properties==
==Norms may define a metric space==
+
* [[The norm of a space is a uniformly continuous map with respect to the topology it induces]] - {{M|\Vert\cdot\Vert:X\rightarrow\mathbb{R} }} is a [[uniformly continuous]] map.
To get a [[Metric space|metric space]] from a norm simply define <math>d(x,y)=\|x-y\|</math>
+
==Terminology==
 +
Such a vector space equipped with such a function is called a [[Normed space|normed space]]<ref name="APIKM"/>
 +
==Relation to various [[subtypes of topological spaces]]==
 +
The reader should note that:
 +
* Every [[inner product]] induces a ''norm'' and
 +
* Every ''norm'' induces a [[metric]]
 +
These are outlined below
 +
===Relation to [[inner product]]===
 +
Every [[inner product]] {{M|\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle:V\times V\rightarrow(\mathbb{R}\text{ or }\mathbb{C})}} induces a ''norm'' given by:
 +
* {{M|1=\Vert x\Vert:=\sqrt{\langle x,x\rangle} }}
 +
{{Todo|see [[inner product#Norm induced by|inner product (norm induced by)]] for more details, on that page is a proof that {{M|\langle x,x\rangle\ge 0}}, this needs its own page with a proof.}}
  
'''HOWEVER:''' It is only true that a normed vector space is a metric space also, given a metric we may ''not'' be able to get an associated norm.
+
===Metric induced by a norm===
 +
To get a [[Metric space|metric space]] from a norm simply define<ref name="FA"/><ref name="APIKM"/>:
 +
* <math>d(x,y):=\|x-y\|</math>
 +
(See [[Subtypes of topological spaces]] for more information, this relationship is very important in [[Functional analysis]])
 +
{{Todo|Move to its own page and do a proof (trivial)}}
  
 
==Weaker and stronger norms==
 
==Weaker and stronger norms==
Line 89: Line 101:
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
 
* [[Euclidean norm]]
 
* [[Euclidean norm]]
{{Definition|Linear Algebra}}
+
 
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references group="Note"/>
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
 +
{{Normed and Banach spaces navbox}}
 +
{{Metric spaces navbox}}
 +
{{Topology navbox}}
 +
{{Definition|Linear Algebra|Topology|Metric Space|Functional Analysis}}
 +
[[Category:Exemplary pages]]
 +
[[Category:First-year friendly]]

Latest revision as of 20:33, 9 April 2017

Norm
:VR0
Where V is a vector space over the field R or C
relation to other topological spaces
is a
contains all
Related objects
Induced metric
  • d:V×VR0
  • d:(x,y)xy
Induced by inner product
  • ,:VR0
  • ,:xx,x
A norm is a an abstraction of the notion of the "length of a vector". Every norm is a metric and every inner product is a norm (see Subtypes of topological spaces for more information), thus every normed vector space is a topological space to, so all the topology theorems apply. Norms are especially useful in functional analysis and also for differentiation.

Definition

A norm on a vector space (V,F) (where F is either R or C) is a function :VR such that[1][2][3][4]See warning notes:[Note 1][Note 2]:

  1. xV x0
  2. x=0x=0
  3. λF,xV λx=|λ|x where || denotes absolute value
  4. x,yV x+yx+y - a form of the triangle inequality

Often parts 1 and 2 are combined into the statement:

  • x0 and x=0x=0 so only 3 requirements will be stated.

I don't like this (inline with the Doctrine of monotonic definition)

Properties

Terminology

Such a vector space equipped with such a function is called a normed space[1]

Relation to various subtypes of topological spaces

The reader should note that:

These are outlined below

Relation to inner product

Every inner product ,:V×V(R or C) induces a norm given by:

  • x:=x,x

TODO: see inner product (norm induced by) for more details, on that page is a proof that x,x0, this needs its own page with a proof.



Metric induced by a norm

To get a metric space from a norm simply define[2][1]:

  • d(x,y):=xy

(See Subtypes of topological spaces for more information, this relationship is very important in Functional analysis)


TODO: Move to its own page and do a proof (trivial)



Weaker and stronger norms

Given a norm 1 and another 2 we say:

  • 1 is weaker than 2 if C>0xV such that x1Cx2
  • 2 is stronger than 1 in this case

Equivalence of norms

Given two norms 1 and 2 on a vector space V we say they are equivalent if:

c,CR with c,C>0 xV: cx1x2Cx1

[Expand]

Theorem: This is an Equivalence relation - so we may write this as 12

Note also that if 1 is both weaker and stronger than 2 they are equivalent

Examples

  • Any two norms on Rn are equivalent
  • The norms L1 and on C([0,1],R) are not equivalent.

Common norms

Name Norm Notes
Norms on Rn
1-norm x1=ni=1|xi| it's just a special case of the p-norm.
2-norm x2=ni=1x2i Also known as the Euclidean norm - it's just a special case of the p-norm.
p-norm xp=(ni=1|xi|p)1p (I use this notation because it can be easy to forget the p in p)
norm x=sup({xi}ni=1) Also called sup-norm
Norms on C([0,1],R)
Lp fLp=(10|f(x)|pdx)1p NOTE be careful extending to interval [a,b] as proof it is a norm relies on having a unit measure
norm f=supx[0,1](|f(x)|) Following the same spirit as the norm on Rn
Ck fCk=ki=1supx[0,1](|f(i)|) here f(k) denotes the kth derivative.
Induced norms
Pullback norm U For a linear isomorphism L:UV where V is a normed vector space

Examples

Notes

  1. Jump up A lot of books, including the brilliant Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin referenced here state explicitly that it is possible for ,:VC they are wrong. I assure you that it is :VR0. Other than this the references are valid, note that this is 'obvious' as if the image of could be in C then the x0 would make no sense. What ordering would you use? The canonical ordering used for the product of 2 spaces (R×R in this case) is the Lexicographic ordering which would put 1+1j1+1000j!
  2. Jump up The other mistake books make is saying explicitly that the field of a vector space needs to be R, it may commonly be R but it does not need to be R

References

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin
  2. Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici
  3. Jump up Functional Analysis - A Gentle Introduction - Volume 1, by Dzung Minh Ha
  4. Jump up Real and Abstract Analysis - Edwin Hewitt & Karl Stromberg