Difference between revisions of "Inner product"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Todo: add trivial properties, a bit more rejigging)
m
Line 20: Line 20:
 
This leads to the most general form:
 
This leads to the most general form:
 
* {{M|1=\langle au+bv,cx+dy\rangle=a\langle u,cx+dy\rangle+b\langle v,cx+dy\rangle}}{{M|1= =a\overline{\langle cx+dy,u\rangle}+b\overline{\langle cx+dy,v\rangle} }}{{M|1= =a(\overline{c\langle x,u\rangle} + \overline{d\langle y,u\rangle})+b(\overline{c\langle x,v\rangle}+\overline{d\langle y,v\rangle})}}{{M|1= =a\overline{c}\langle u,x\rangle+a\overline{d}\langle u,y\rangle+b\overline{c}\langle v,x\rangle+b\overline{d}\langle v,y\rangle}}
 
* {{M|1=\langle au+bv,cx+dy\rangle=a\langle u,cx+dy\rangle+b\langle v,cx+dy\rangle}}{{M|1= =a\overline{\langle cx+dy,u\rangle}+b\overline{\langle cx+dy,v\rangle} }}{{M|1= =a(\overline{c\langle x,u\rangle} + \overline{d\langle y,u\rangle})+b(\overline{c\langle x,v\rangle}+\overline{d\langle y,v\rangle})}}{{M|1= =a\overline{c}\langle u,x\rangle+a\overline{d}\langle u,y\rangle+b\overline{c}\langle v,x\rangle+b\overline{d}\langle v,y\rangle}}
{{Begin Theorem}}
+
{{Begin Inline Theorem}}
 
Proof of claim: {{M|1=\langle x,\alpha y+\beta z\rangle=\overline{\alpha}\langle x, y\rangle +\overline{\beta}\langle x,z\rangle}}
 
Proof of claim: {{M|1=\langle x,\alpha y+\beta z\rangle=\overline{\alpha}\langle x, y\rangle +\overline{\beta}\langle x,z\rangle}}
 
{{Begin Proof}}
 
{{Begin Proof}}

Revision as of 11:42, 10 July 2015

Definition

Given a vector space, (V,F) (where F is either R or C), an inner product[1][2][3] is a map:

  • ,:V×VR
    (or sometimes ,:V×VC
    )

Such that:

  • x,y=¯y,x
    (where the bar denotes Complex conjugate)
    • Or just x,y=y,x
      if the inner product is into R
  • λx+μy,z=λy,z+μx,z
    ( linearity in first argument )
    This may be alternatively stated as:
    • λx,y=λx,y
      and x+y,z=x,z+y,z
  • x,x0
    but specifically:
    • x,x=0x=0

Properties

Notice that ,

is also linear (ish) in its second argument as:

  • x,λy+μz=¯λy+μz,x
    =¯λy,x+μz,x
    =ˉλ¯y,x+ˉμ¯z,x
    =ˉλx,y+ˉμx,z

From this we may conclude the following:

  • x,λy=ˉλx,y
    and
  • x,y+z=x,y+x,z

This leads to the most general form:

  • au+bv,cx+dy=au,cx+dy+bv,cx+dy=a¯cx+dy,u+b¯cx+dy,v=a(¯cx,u+¯dy,u)+b(¯cx,v+¯dy,v)=a¯cu,x+a¯du,y+b¯cv,x+b¯dv,y
[Expand]

Proof of claim: x,αy+βz=¯αx,y+¯βx,z </b>

</div>


Examples

See also

References

  1. Jump up http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inner_product_space&oldid=651022885
  2. Jump up Functional Analysis I - Lecture Notes - Richard Sharp - Sep 2014
  3. Jump up Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici