Difference between revisions of "Injection"
From Maths
m (Typo) |
m (Added "statement" section, this page needs an update) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Or equivalently: | Or equivalently: | ||
* <math>\forall x_1,x_2\in X[x_1\ne x_2\implies f(x_1)\ne f(x_2)]</math> (the [[Contrapositive|contrapositive]] of the above) | * <math>\forall x_1,x_2\in X[x_1\ne x_2\implies f(x_1)\ne f(x_2)]</math> (the [[Contrapositive|contrapositive]] of the above) | ||
− | + | ==Statements== | |
+ | * [[Every injection yields a bijection onto its image]] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
===Terminology=== | ===Terminology=== |
Revision as of 11:10, 26 September 2016
An injective function is 1:1, but not nessasarally onto.
Contents
[hide]Definition
For a function f:X→Y every element of X is mapped to an element of Y and no two distinct things in X are mapped to the same thing in Y. That is[1]:
- ∀x1,x2∈X[f(x1)=f(x2)⟹x1=x2]
Or equivalently:
- ∀x1,x2∈X[x1≠x2⟹f(x1)≠f(x2)] (the contrapositive of the above)
Statements
Notes
Terminology
- An injective function is sometimes called an embedding[1]
- Just as surjections are called 'onto' an injection may be called 'into'[2] however this is rare and something I frown upon.
- This is French, from "throwing into" referring to the domain, not elements themselves (as any function takes an element into the codomain, it need not be one-to-one)
- I do not like using the word into but do like onto - I say:
- "But f maps A onto B so...."
- "But f is an injection so...."
- "As f is a bijection..."
- I see into used rarely to mean injection, and in fact any function f:X→Y being read as f takes X into Y without meaning injection[1][3]
Properties
- The cardinality of the inverse of an element y∈Y may be no more than 1
- Note this means it may be zero
- In contrast to a bijection where the cardinality is always 1 (and thus we take the singleton set f−1(y)={x} as the value it contains, writing f−1(y)=x)
- Note this means it may be zero
See also
References
- ↑ Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Analysis: Part 1 - Elements - Krzysztof Maurin
- Jump up ↑ http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52454.html
- Jump up ↑ Real and Abstract Analysis - Edwin Hewitt and Karl Stromberg