Injection
From Maths
Grade: A*
This page requires some work to be carried out
Some aspect of this page is incomplete and work is required to finish it
The message provided is:
The message provided is:
This needs to be modified (in tandem with Surjection) to:
- allow surjection/injection/bijection to be seen through the lens of Category Theory. Alec (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- be linked to cardinality of sets and that Cantor theorem. Alec (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
An injective function is 1:1, but not nessasarally onto.
Contents
[hide]Definition
For a function f:X→Y every element of X is mapped to an element of Y and no two distinct things in X are mapped to the same thing in Y. That is[1]:
- ∀x1,x2∈X[f(x1)=f(x2)⟹x1=x2]
Or equivalently:
- ∀x1,x2∈X[x1≠x2⟹f(x1)≠f(x2)] (the contrapositive of the above)
Sometimes an injection is denoted ↣[2] (and a surjection \twoheadrightarrow and a bijection is both of these combined (as if super-imposed on top of each other) - there is no LaTeX arrow for this however) - we do not use this convention.
Statements
Notes
Terminology
- An injective function is sometimes called an embedding[1]
- Just as surjections are called 'onto' an injection may be called 'into'[3] however this is rare and something I frown upon.
- This is French, from "throwing into" referring to the domain, not elements themselves (as any function takes an element into the codomain, it need not be one-to-one)
- I do not like using the word into but do like onto - I say:
- "But f maps A onto B so...."
- "But f is an injection so...."
- "As f is a bijection..."
- I see into used rarely to mean injection, and in fact any function f:X\rightarrow Y being read as f takes X into Y without meaning injection[1][4]
Properties
- The cardinality of the inverse of an element y\in Y may be no more than 1
- Note this means it may be zero
- In contrast to a bijection where the cardinality is always 1 (and thus we take the singleton set f^{-1}(y)=\{x\} as the value it contains, writing f^{-1}(y)=x)
- Note this means it may be zero
See also
References
- ↑ Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 Analysis: Part 1 - Elements - Krzysztof Maurin
- Jump up ↑ Notes On Set Theory - Second Edition - Yiannis Moschovakis
- Jump up ↑ http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52454.html
- Jump up ↑ Real and Abstract Analysis - Edwin Hewitt and Karl Stromberg
|