Difference between revisions of "Inner product"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Properties)
m
Line 38: Line 38:
 
: As required
 
: As required
 
{{End Proof}}{{End Theorem}}
 
{{End Proof}}{{End Theorem}}
 
+
==Notation==
 +
Typically, {{M|\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle}} is the notation for inner products, however I have seen some authors use {{M|\langle a,b\rangle}} to denote the [[Ordered pair|ordered pair]] containing {{M|a}} and {{M|b}}. Also, notably<ref name="FA"/> use {{M|(\cdot,\cdot)}} for an inner product (and {{M|\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle}} for an ordered pair!)
 
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
 
* [[Vector dot product]]
 
* [[Vector dot product]]

Revision as of 18:43, 10 July 2015

Definition

Given a vector space, (V,F) (where F is either R or C), an inner product[1][2][3] is a map:

  • ,:V×VR (or sometimes ,:V×VC)

Such that:

  • x,y=¯y,x (where the bar denotes Complex conjugate)
    • Or just x,y=y,x if the inner product is into R
  • λx+μy,z=λy,z+μx,z ( linearity in first argument )
    This may be alternatively stated as:
    • λx,y=λx,y and x+y,z=x,z+y,z
  • x,x0 but specifically:
    • x,x=0x=0

Properties

Notice that , is also linear (ish) in its second argument as:

[Expand]

  • x,λy+μz=ˉλx,y+ˉμx,z

From this we may conclude the following:

  • x,λy=ˉλx,y and
  • x,y+z=x,y+x,z

This leads to the most general form:

[Expand]

  • au+bv,cx+dy=a¯cu,x+a¯du,y+b¯cv,x+b¯dv,y - which isn't worth remembering!

Notation

Typically, , is the notation for inner products, however I have seen some authors use a,b to denote the ordered pair containing a and b. Also, notably[3] use (,) for an inner product (and , for an ordered pair!)

Examples

See also

References

  1. Jump up http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inner_product_space&oldid=651022885
  2. Jump up Functional Analysis I - Lecture Notes - Richard Sharp - Sep 2014
  3. Jump up to: 3.0 3.1 Functional Analysis - George Bachman and Lawrence Narici