Difference between revisions of "Compactness"

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 16: Line 16:
 
Then the collection <math>\{A_\alpha\cap Y|\alpha\in I\}</math> is a covering of <math>Y</math> by sets open in <math>Y</math> (by definition of [[Subspace topology|being a subspace]])
 
Then the collection <math>\{A_\alpha\cap Y|\alpha\in I\}</math> is a covering of <math>Y</math> by sets open in <math>Y</math> (by definition of [[Subspace topology|being a subspace]])
  
By hypothesis <math>Y</math> is compact, hence a finite subcollection <math>\{A_i\cap Y\}^n_{i=1}</math> covers <math>Y</math>
+
By hypothesis <math>Y</math> is compact, hence a finite subcollection <math>\{A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y\}^n_{i=1}</math> covers <math>Y</math> '''(as to be compact ''every'' open cover must have a finite subcover)'''
  
Then <math>\{A_i\}^n_{i=1}</math> is a subcollection of <math>\mathcal{A}</math> that covers <math>Y</math>.  
+
Then <math>\{A_{\alpha_i}\}^n_{i=1}</math> is a subcollection of <math>\mathcal{A}</math> that covers <math>Y</math>.
====<math>\impliedby</math>====
+
 
 +
=====Details=====
 +
As [[The intersection of sets is a subset of each set]] and <math>\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)=Y</math> we see <br />
 +
<math>x\in\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)\implies\exists k\in\mathbb{N}\text{ with }1\le k\le n:x\in A_{\alpha_k}\cap Y\implies x\in A_{\alpha_k}\implies x\in\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}</math><br />
 +
The important part being <math>x\in\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)\implies x\in\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}</math><br />
 +
then by the [[Implies and subset relation|implies and subset relation]] we have <math>Y=\cup^n_{i=1}(A_{\alpha_i}\cap Y)\subset\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}</math> and conclude <math>Y\subset\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}</math>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Lastly, as <math>\mathcal{A}</math> was a covering <math>\cup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha=Y</math>.
 +
 
 +
It is clear that <math>x\in\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\implies x\in\cup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha</math> so again  [[Implies and subset relation|implies and subset relation]] we have:<br />
 +
<math>\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\subset\cup_{\alpha\in I}A_\alpha=Y</math> thus concluding <math>\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\subset Y</math>
 +
 
 +
Combining <math>Y\subset\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}</math> and <math>\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}\subset Y</math> we see <math>\cup^n_{i=1}A_{\alpha_i}=Y</math>
 +
 
 +
Thus <math>\{A_{\alpha_i}\}^n_{i=1}</math> is a finite covering of <math>Y</math> consisting of '''open''' sets from <math>X</math>
 +
====<math>\impliedby</math>====  
  
  
 
{{Definition|Topology}}
 
{{Definition|Topology}}

Revision as of 18:07, 13 February 2015

Definition

A topological space is compact if every open cover (often denoted A) of X contains a finite sub-collection that also covers X

Lemma for a set being compact

Take a set YX in a topological space (X,J).

To say Y is compact is for Y to be compact when considered as a subspace of (X,J)

That is to say that Y is compact if and only if every covering of Y by sets open in X contains a finite subcovering covering Y

Proof

Suppose that the space (Y,Jsubspace) is compact and that A={Aα}αI where each AαJ (that is each set is open in X).

Then the collection {AαY|αI} is a covering of Y by sets open in Y (by definition of being a subspace)

By hypothesis Y is compact, hence a finite subcollection {AαiY}ni=1 covers Y (as to be compact every open cover must have a finite subcover)

Then {Aαi}ni=1 is a subcollection of A that covers Y.

Details

As The intersection of sets is a subset of each set and ni=1(AαiY)=Y we see
xni=1(AαiY)kN with 1kn:xAαkYxAαkxni=1Aαi
The important part being xni=1(AαiY)xni=1Aαi
then by the implies and subset relation we have Y=ni=1(AαiY)ni=1Aαi and conclude Yni=1Aαi


Lastly, as A was a covering αIAα=Y.

It is clear that xni=1AαixαIAα so again implies and subset relation we have:
ni=1AαiαIAα=Y thus concluding ni=1AαiY

Combining Yni=1Aαi and ni=1AαiY we see ni=1Aαi=Y

Thus {Aαi}ni=1 is a finite covering of Y consisting of open sets from X