Exercises:Saul - Algebraic Topology - 8/Exercise 8.5

From Maths
< Exercises:Saul - Algebraic Topology - 8
Revision as of 14:54, 7 March 2017 by Alec (Talk | contribs) (Saving work)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Exercises

Exercise 8.5

\newcommand\J{\mathcal{J} }Suppose (M,\J_M) is a topological m-manifold, and (\mathbb{R}^m,\J_m) is a topological space of the standard m-dimensional Euclidean space[Note 1], then suppose (N,\J_N) is a topological n-manifold, and (\mathbb{R}^n,\J_n) is n-dimensional Euclidean space with its usual topology.

Suppose that f:M\rightarrow N is a homeomorphism, so M\cong_f N, show that if this is so then we must have m\eq n - a usual logical implication question.

Precursors

We make extensive use of the following theorem:

[Expand]

Given a homeomorphism all subspaces of the domain are homeomorphic to their image under the homeomorphism itself

Also:

Note: there are 3 common and equivalent definitions of locally euclidean (of fixed dimension), they vary as follows:
  • There exists a unique {{M|n\in\mathbb{N}_0}] such that:
    • For all points of the manifold there is an open neighbourhood to the point such that
      1. that the neighbourhood is homeomorphic to an open set of \mathbb{R}^n
      2. that the neighbourhood is homeomorphic to an open ball (of some radius, with some centre) in \mathbb{R}^n
        • that the neighbourhood is homeomorphic to the open unit ball centred at the origin - this is easy as any open ball centred anywhere is homeomorphic to this open ball
      3. that the neighbourhood is homeomorphic to \mathbb{R}^n.
  • We take it as known that these are equivalent, thus we may choose any. I use the first one (homeomorphic to any open set) as the others are trivially instances of this

Proof

TODO: We need to show that W_1 and W_4 are non-empty.

Notes

  1. Jump up We mention the topology as V_1\in\J_m makes it obvious V_1\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m and V_1 is an open set of \mathbb{R}^n
  2. Jump up this is easy to show because f is a bijection but Caveat:May not be true in general! consider a non-injective function with f(a)\eq f(b) for a\neq b and b\notin W_3 for example, it is also conceivable that U_1\neq f^{-1}(f(U_1)) - however as we have a bijection it is okay

References