Disjoint union topology
Definition
Suppose ((Xα,Jα))α∈I be an indexed family of topological spaces that are non-empty[1], the disjoint union topology is a topological space:
- with underlying set ∐α∈IXα, this is the disjoint union of sets, recall (x,β)∈∐α∈IXα⟺β∈I∧x∈Xβ and
- The topology where U∈P(∐α∈IXα) is considered open if and only if ∀α∈I[Xα∩U∈Jα][Note 1] - be sure to notice the abuse of notation going on here.
TODO: Flesh out notes, mention subspace Xα×{α} and such
Claim 1: this is indeed a topology
TODO: Define the canonical injections of the disjoint union topology here
Note that the canonical injections of the disjoint union topology are topological embeddings
Characteristic property
Let ((Xα,Jα))α∈I be a collection of topological spaces and let (Y,K) be another topological space]]. We denote by ∐α∈IXα the disjoint unions of the underlying sets of the members of the family, and by J the disjoint union on it (so (∐α∈IXα,J) is the disjoint union topological construct of the ((Xα,Jα))α∈I family) and lastly, let f:∐α∈IXα→Y be a map (not necessarily continuous) then:
we state the characteristic property of disjoint union topology as follows:
TODO: rewrite and rephrase this
- f:∐α∈IXα→Y is continuous if and only if ∀α∈I[f|X∗α:iα(Xα)→Y is continuous]
Where (for β∈I) we have iβ:Xβ→∐α∈IXα given by iβ:x↦(β,x) are the canonical injections
Proof of claims
The message provided is:
Notes
- Jump up ↑ There's a very nasty abuse of notation going on here. First, note a set U is going to be a bunch of points of the form (x,γ) for various xs and γs (∈I). There is no "canonical projection" FROM the product to the spaces, as this would not be a function!
References
|
TODO: Investigate the need to be non-empty, I suspect it's because the union "collapses" in this case, and the space wouldn't be a part of union