Disjoint union topology

From Maths
(Redirected from Coproduct topology)
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Grade A until it is more presentable.

Definition

Suppose ((Xα,Jα))αI be an indexed family of topological spaces that are non-empty[1], the disjoint union topology is a topological space:

  • with underlying set αIXα, this is the disjoint union of sets, recall (x,β)αIXαβIxXβ and
  • The topology where UP(αIXα) is considered open if and only if αI[XαUJα][Note 1] - be sure to notice the abuse of notation going on here.

TODO: Flesh out notes, mention subspace Xα×{α} and such


Claim 1: this is indeed a topology


TODO: Define the canonical injections of the disjoint union topology here


Note that the canonical injections of the disjoint union topology are topological embeddings

Characteristic property

Let ((Xα,Jα))αI be a collection of topological spaces and let (Y,K) be another topological space]]. We denote by αIXα the disjoint unions of the underlying sets of the members of the family, and by J the disjoint union on it (so (αIXα,J) is the disjoint union topological construct of the ((Xα,Jα))αI family) and lastly, let f:αIXαY be a map (not necessarily continuous) then:
we state the characteristic property of disjoint union topology as follows:


TODO: rewrite and rephrase this


  • f:αIXαY is continuous if and only if αI[f|Xα:iα(Xα)Y is continuous]

Where (for βI) we have iβ:XβαIXα given by iβ:x(β,x) are the canonical injections

Proof of claims

(Unknown grade)
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Actually surprisingly easy to prove, done on paper. page 1, 7/8/2016, Intro to top manifolds notes. Filed

Notes

  1. Jump up There's a very nasty abuse of notation going on here. First, note a set U is going to be a bunch of points of the form (x,γ) for various xs and γs (I). There is no "canonical projection" FROM the product to the spaces, as this would not be a function!

References

  1. Jump up Introduction to Topological Manifolds - John M. Lee



TODO: Investigate the need to be non-empty, I suspect it's because the union "collapses" in this case, and the space wouldn't be a part of union