Linear independence
From Maths
Contents
[hide]Definition
Given an arbitrary subset, S of a vector space (V,F) (that is to say S⊆V[Note 1]) if[1]:
- For all finite sums ∑iaivi with distinct vi∈S we have that ∑iaivi=0 ⟹ ∀i[ai=0]
This can be stated more concretely as:
- ∀{vα}α∈I∈P(S)[(n:=|{vα}α∈I|)∈N⟹[(n∑i=1λivi=0)⟹(λi=0∀i∈I)]][CorrectedRef 1] (with the slight abuse of notation that once {vα}α∈I is known to be finite we can index it by integers from 1 to n)
- Notice that we distill the distinct part by using the power set, and then we require finite-ness before we consider solutions to the summation of the subset being zero.
Then we say that S is a linearly independent set of vectors
Equivalent condition
The statement that:
- ∀{vα}α∈I∈P(S)[(n:=|{vα}α∈I|)∈N⟹[(∑ni=1λivi=0)⟹(λi=0∀i∈I)]] (given above)
Is the same as:
- 0∉S and:
- For every finite sum of the subspaces of the form ℓv={av|a∈F} is direct.
TODO: Document sums and directness
For a finite S
When S⊆V is finite the definition becomes so much nicer it is worth mentioning.
Given a finite subset, S⊆V of a vector space (V,F), where S={s1,s2,…,sn}, we say the vectors in S are linearly independent if:
- The only solution (of λ1,…,λn) to n∑i=1siλi=0is λi=0 ∀i∈{1,2,…,n} - this is sometimes described as the trivial solution[Note 2]
TODO: Find reference, I didn't bring any undergraduate Lin. Algebra books with me
See also
Notes
- Jump up ↑ Note that the use of ⊆ just means we don't require a proper subset, in fact as the vector space contains a zero any linearly independent set must be a proper subset, as to have the zero vector allows the scalar coefficient of it to be arbitrary!
- Jump up ↑ As if you need to find some λis such that the summation is zero, it is trivial to choose λi=0 for all i
References
- Jump up ↑ Topology & Manifolds
Corrections applied to references
- Jump up ↑ Corrected from Tensors and manifolds which claimed that:
- If for all finite sums ∑iaivi with vi∈S we have that ∑iaivi=0 ⟹ ai=0∀i
- The vi in the sum be distinct. Suppose that s∈S, then −3s+3s=0, but 3≠0 and −3≠0 thus with this definition only the empty set is linearly independent. It is clear it wanted to say they were distinct.