Linear independence

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search

Definition

Given an arbitrary subset, S of a vector space (V,F) (that is to say SV[Note 1]) if[1]:

  • For all finite sums iaivi with distinct viS we have that iaivi=0  i[ai=0]

This can be stated more concretely as:

  • {vα}αIP(S)[(n:=|{vα}αI|)N[(ni=1λivi=0)(λi=0iI)]]
    [CorrectedRef 1] (with the slight abuse of notation that once {vα}αI is known to be finite we can index it by integers from 1 to n)
    Notice that we distill the distinct part by using the power set, and then we require finite-ness before we consider solutions to the summation of the subset being zero.

Then we say that S is a linearly independent set of vectors

Equivalent condition

The statement that:

  • {vα}αIP(S)[(n:=|{vα}αI|)N[(ni=1λivi=0)(λi=0iI)]] (given above)

Is the same as:

  • 0S and:
  • For every finite sum of the subspaces of the form v={av|aF} is direct.

TODO: Document sums and directness



For a finite S

When SV is finite the definition becomes so much nicer it is worth mentioning.

Given a finite subset, SV of a vector space (V,F), where S={s1,s2,,sn}, we say the vectors in S are linearly independent if:

  • The only solution (of λ1,,λn) to ni=1siλi=0
    is λi=0 i{1,2,,n} - this is sometimes described as the trivial solution[Note 2]

TODO: Find reference, I didn't bring any undergraduate Lin. Algebra books with me



See also

Notes

  1. Jump up Note that the use of just means we don't require a proper subset, in fact as the vector space contains a zero any linearly independent set must be a proper subset, as to have the zero vector allows the scalar coefficient of it to be arbitrary!
  2. Jump up As if you need to find some λis such that the summation is zero, it is trivial to choose λi=0 for all i

References

  1. Jump up Topology & Manifolds

Corrections applied to references

  1. Jump up Corrected from Tensors and manifolds which claimed that:
    • If for all finite sums iaivi with viS we have that iaivi=0  ai=0i
    This misses the requirement that:
    • The vi in the sum be distinct. Suppose that sS, then 3s+3s=0, but 30 and 30 thus with this definition only the empty set is linearly independent. It is clear it wanted to say they were distinct.
    Checked against Wikipedia