Order terminology

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is to provide a summary of partial orders, strict partial orders and associated terminology.

Stub grade: A*
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Useful page, could use fleshing out and having things link to it.
  • Demote once table finished, I really want least/minimal element, because these are different.

Orders

Just as with functions we may speak of partial/total terminology. A partial function for which every two elements are comparable, is a total order (sometimes called linear). Just as a total function is a partial function that maps everything to something, a total order compares everything.


An order relation can be given in one of two forms, a strict form or a "normal" (non-strict) form, these contain exactly the same information.

If (X,) is a poset, a set with a partial order, then we get a strict partial order, defined as follows:

  • xy(xyxy)

And of course, given a strict partial order (or sposet, (X,)), , we can obtain a partial order, denoted as follows:

  • xy(xyx=y)
TODO: I need a link to the proof that these are the same

Partial orders

When thinking of orders the first example you should think of is the subset relation. As this is a "true" partial order (it is not a total order provided you are looking at sets in the power set of a set with more than one element). Notice that for subsets of {1,2,3} that in no way is:

  • {1,2} a subset, or superset of {2,3}.

A total order (like a total function) means any two elements are comparable, then the more usual examples of the natural numbers and co come in handy.

These definitions follow:

  • A partial ordering, or poset, (X,), is a binary relation that is:
    1. Reflexive - xX[xx][Note 1]
    2. Identitive / Antisymmetric - x,yX[(xyyx)x=y]
    3. Transitive - x,y,zX[(xyyz)xy]
  • A strict partial ordering, or sposet, (X,) (notice it is not [Note 2]), this is again a binary relation, where must be:
    1. Irreflexive[Note 3] - xX[¬(xx)], perhaps better written as: xX[(x,x)∉≺] or xX[x; and
    2. Transitive - \forall x,y,z\in X[(x\prec y\wedge y\prec z)\implies x\prec z]. As before.

Terms

Minimum/Maximum dual terms

Let (X,\preceq) be a poset and let Y\in\mathcal{P}(X) be an arbitrary subset. Then y\in Y is a...

Lower form Lower definition Upper form Upper definition Comments
Minimal element \forall x\in Y[x\preceq y\implies y\eq x] Maximal element \forall x\in Y[x\succeq y\implies y\eq x]
Least element \forall x\in Y[y\preceq x] Greatest element \forall x\in Y[y\succeq x]
Caveat:Be careful with these, there can be more than one minimal element, it's weird
TODO: More on this later

Notes

  1. Jump up We write: a\preceq b to mean (a,b)\in\preceq - as usual for relations
  2. Jump up Exactly as occurs with \le and <
  3. Jump up Literally, "not reflexive"

References