Proof that the fundamental group is actually a group

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
Stub grade: A
This page is a stub
This page is a stub, so it contains little or minimal information and is on a to-do list for being expanded.The message provided is:
Add proofs, then demote

Statement

Let (X,J) be a topological space and let bX be given. Then Ω(X,b) denotes the "set of all loops based at b in X"[Note 1]. We claim that from this we can make a group, (π(X,b),) called the fundamental group where[1]:

  • π(X,b):=Ω(X,b)(()() (rel {0,1})
TODO: Finish writing statement, mention that we're trying to factor loop concatenation through
Note: for an outline of the proof see below: outline

Proof

We wish to show that the set π1(X,b):=Ω(X,b)(()() (rel {0,1})) is actually a group with the operation ¯ as described in the outline.

  1. Factoring:
    • Setup:
      • :Ω(X,b)×Ω(X,b)Ω(X,b) - the operation of loop concatenation - :(1,2)(12:IX by 12:t{1(2t)for t[0,12](2t1)for t[12,1])
      through
      • (p,p):Ω(X,b)×Ω(X,b)π1(X,b)×π1(X,b) by (p,p):(1,2)(p(1),p(2))
        • where p:Ω(X,b)π1(X,b) is the canonical projection of the equivalence relation. As such we may say:
        • (p,p) is given by by (p,p):(1,2)([1],[2]) instead
      • We must show:
        • 1,2,1,2Ω(X,b)[([1]=[1][2]=[2])([12]=[12])][Note 3]
    • Proof:
      • Let 1,2,1,2Ω(X,b) be given
        • Suppose that ¬([1]=[1][2]=[2]) holds, then by the nature of logical implication we're done, as we do not care about the RHS's truth or falsity in this case
        • Suppose that [1]=[1][2]=[2] holds. We must show that in this case we have [12]=[12]
      • Since 1,2,1 and 2 were arbitrary this holds for all.
    • Conclusion
      • We obtain ¯:π1(X,b)×π1(X,b)π1(X,b) given unambiguously by:
        • ¯:([1],[2])[12]
    • Thus the group operation is:
      • [1]¯[2]:=[12]
  2. Associativity of the operation ¯
  3. Existence of an identity element in (π1(X,b),¯)
  4. For each element of π1(X,b) the existence of an inverse element in (π1(X,b),¯)
Grade: A*
This page requires one or more proofs to be filled in, it is on a to-do list for being expanded with them.
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. Unless there are any caveats mentioned below the statement comes from a reliable source. As always, Warnings and limitations will be clearly shown and possibly highlighted if very important (see template:Caution et al).
The message provided is:
Finish this off

Outline of proof

Factoring (loop concatenation) setup
Let (X,J) be a topological space and let bX be given. Then Ω(X,b) is the set of all loops based at b. Let ()() (rel {0,1}) denote the relation of end-point-preserving homotopy on C([0,1],X) - the set of all paths in X - but considered only on the subset of C([0,1],X), Ω(X,b).

Then we define: π1(X,b):=Ω(X,b)(()() (rel {0,1}))

, a standard quotient by an equivalence relation.

Consider the binary function: :Ω(X,b)×Ω(X,b)Ω(X,b) defined by loop concatenation, or explicitly:

  • :(1,2)(12:[0,1]X given by 12:t{1(2t)for t[0,12]2(2t1)for t[12,1])
    • notice that t=12 is in both parts, this is a nod to the pasting lemma

We now have the situation on the right. Note that:

  • (π,π):Ω(X,b)×Ω(X,b)π1(X,b)×π1(X,b) is just π applied to an ordered pair, (π,π):(1,2)([1],[2])


In order to factor (π) through (π,π) we require (as per the factor (function) page) that:

  • (1,2),(1,2)Ω(X,b)×Ω(X,b)[((π,π)(1,2)=(π,π)(1,2))(π(12)=π(12))], this can be written better using our standard notation:
    • 1,2,1,2Ω(X,b)[(([1],[2])=([1],[2]))([12]=[12])]


Then we get (just by applying the function factorisation theorem):

  • ¯:π1(X,b)×π1(X,b)π1(X,b) given (unambiguously) by ¯:([1],[2])[12] or written more nicely as:
    • [1]¯[2]:=[12]


Lastly we show (π1(X,b),¯) forms a group

Notes

  1. Jump up Which is a subset of C(I,X)
  2. Jump up Recall a path is a continuous function from [0,1]R with it's usual topology (given by the absolute value metric) to X with the given topology. A loop is then just a path such that if p:[0,1]X is a path.
  3. Jump up Note that we turn ([1],[2])=([1],[2]) into [1]=[1][2]=[2] by using the defining property of an ordered pair

References

  1. Jump up Introduction to Topological Manifolds - John M. Lee