Subsequence/Definition

From Maths
Jump to: navigation, search
Grade: A
This page requires cleaning up
Some aspect of this page is rather messy and it needs to be cleaned up
The message provided is:
The notes are a bit messy

Definition

Given a sequence (xn)n=1 we define a subsequence of (xn)n=1[1][2] as follows:

  • Given any strictly increasing monotonic sequence[Note 1], (kn)n=1N
    • That means that nN[kn<kn+1][Note 2]

Then the subsequence of (xn) given by (kn) is:

  • (xkn)n=1, the sequence whose terms are: xk1,xk2,,xkn,
    • That is to say the ith element of (xkn) is the kith element of (xn)

As a mapping

Consider an (injective) mapping: k:NN with the property that:

  • a,bN[a<bk(a)<k(b)]

This defines a sequence, (kn)n=1 given by kn:=k(n)

  • Now (xkn)n=1 is a subsequence

Notes

  1. Jump up Note that strictly increasing cannot be replaced by non-decreasing as the sequence could stay the same (ie a term where mi=mi+1 for example), it didn't decrease, but it didn't increase either. It must be STRICTLY increasing.

    If it was simply "non-decreasing" or just "increasing" then we could define: kn:=5 for all n.
    • Then (xkn)nN is a constant sequence where every term is x5 - the 5th term of (xn).
  2. Jump up Some books may simply require increasing, this is wrong. Take the theorem from Equivalent statements to compactness of a metric space which states that a metric space is compact every sequence contains a convergent subequence. If we only require that:
    • knkn+1
    Then we can define the sequence: kn:=1. This defines the subsequence x1,x1,x1,x1, of (xn)n=1 which obviously converges. This defeats the purpose of subsequences. A subsequence should preserve the "forwardness" of a sequence, that is for a sub-sequence the terms are seen in the same order they would be seen in the parent sequence, and also the "sub" part means building a sequence from it, we want to built a sequence by choosing terms, suggesting we ought not use terms twice.
    The mapping definition directly supports this, as the mapping can be thought of as choosing terms

References

  1. Jump up Analysis - Part 1: Elements - Krzysztof Maurin
  2. Jump up Functional Analysis - Volume 1: A gentle introduction - Dzung Minh Ha