Compactness
Not to be confused with Sequential compactness
There are two views here.
- Compactness is a topological property and we cannot say a set is compact, we say it is compact and implicitly consider it with the subspace topology
- We can say "sure that set is compact".
The difference comes into play when we cover a set (take the interval [0,5]⊂R) with open sets. Suppose we have the covering {(−1,3),(2,6)} this is already finite and covers the interval. The corresponding sets in the subspace topology are {[0,3),(2,5]} which are both open in the subspace topology.
Contents
[hide]Definition
A topological space is compact if every open cover (often denoted A
Lemma for a set being compact
Take a set Y⊂X
To say Y
That is to say that Y
Proof
⟹
Suppose that the space (Y,Jsubspace)
Then the collection {Aα∩Y|α∈I}
By hypothesis Y
Then {Aαi}ni=1
Details
As The intersection of sets is a subset of each set and ∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)=Y
x∈∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)⟹∃k∈N with 1≤k≤n:x∈Aαk∩Y
The important part being x∈∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)⟹x∈∪ni=1Aαi
then by the implies and subset relation we have Y=∪ni=1(Aαi∩Y)⊂∪ni=1Aαi
Lastly, as A
It is clear that x∈∪ni=1Aαi⟹x∈∪α∈IAα
∪ni=1Aαi⊂∪α∈IAα=Y
Combining Y⊂∪ni=1Aαi
Thus {Aαi}ni=1
⟸
Suppose that every covering of Y
Suppose we have a covering, A′={A′α}α∈I
For each α
Then the collection A={Aα}α∈I
By hypothesis we have a finite sub-collection of things open in X
Thus the corresponding finite subcollection of A′