Compactness

From Maths
Revision as of 03:50, 22 June 2015 by Alec (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Not to be confused with Sequential compactness


There are two views here.

  1. Compactness is a topological property and we cannot say a set is compact, we say it is compact and implicitly consider it with the subspace topology
  2. We can say "sure that set is compact".

The difference comes into play when we cover a set (take the interval [0,5]R) with open sets. Suppose we have the covering {(1,3),(2,6)} this is already finite and covers the interval. The corresponding sets in the subspace topology are {[0,3),(2,5]} which are both open in the subspace topology.

This page is currently being refactored (along with many others)
Please note that this does not mean the content is unreliable. It just means the page doesn't conform to the style of the site (usually due to age) or a better way of presenting the information has been discovered.

Definition

That is to say that given an arbitrary collection of sets:

  • A={Aα}αI such that each Aα is open in X and
  • X=αIAα
    [Note 1]

The following is true:

  • {i1,,in}I such that X=α{i1,,in}Aα

Then X is compact[1]

Lemma for a set being compact

Take a set YX

in a topological space (X,J)
. Then to say:

  • Y
    is compact

Means Y

satisfies the definition of compactness when considered as a subspace of (X,J)

[Expand]

Theorem: A set YX is a compact in (X,J) if and only if every covering of Y by sets open in X contains a finite subcovering.


See also

Notes

  1. Jump up Note that we actually have XαIAα but as topologies are closed under arbitrary union and contain the set the open sets are subsets of we cannot "exceed X", so we must have X=αIAα

References

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 Topology - James R. Munkres - Second Edition