NeedEditingSpace
From Maths
Purpose
- For use with the Unique lifting property page
Content
Proof that T is an open set:\newcommand{\bigudot}{ \mathchoice{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-15mu\cdot\mkern8mu}}{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-13mu\cdot\mkern5mu}}{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-13mu\cdot\mkern5mu}}{\mathop{\bigcup\mkern-13mu\cdot\mkern5mu}} }\newcommand{\udot}{\cup\mkern-12.5mu\cdot\mkern6.25mu\!}\require{AMScd}\newcommand{\d}[1][]{\mathrm{d}^{#1} }
- Let t\in T be given - Caution:The result requires that T is empty, but we can still do this[Note 1]
- Define r_1:\eq g(t), note r_1\in E
- Define r_2:\eq h(t), note r_2\in E
- Define z:\eq p(r_1):\eq p(g(t))\eq f(t) by g being a lifting, note z\in X
- Note that z:\eq p(g(t))\eq f(t)\eq p(h(t))\eq: p(r_2) by h being a lifting, so we have
- p(r_1)\eq p(r_2)
- As p is a covering map we see that:
- \exists U\in\mathcal{J}[z\in U\wedge U\text{ is evenly covered by }p]
- By evenly covered: \exists(V_\alpha)_{\alpha\in I}\subseteq\mathcal{H}\big[\bigudot_{\alpha\in I}V_\alpha\eq p^{-1}(U)\wedge \big(\forall\beta\in I[V_\beta\cong_{p\vert_{V_\beta}^\text{Im} } U]\big)\big] (note that \bigudot emphasises the union is of pairwise disjoint sets)
- \exists U\in\mathcal{J}[z\in U\wedge U\text{ is evenly covered by }p]
- Define (V_\alpha)_{\alpha\in I} \subseteq H to be the arbitrary family of sets open in E which are the sheets of the covering of U.
- Then:
- \exists\beta\in I[r_1\in V_\beta]
- \exists\gamma\in I[r_2\in V_\gamma]
- Lemma: \beta\neq\gamma
- Suppose that \beta\eq\gamma (and thus use V_\beta as the notation and discard \gamma)
- Then r_1\in V_\beta and r_2\in V_\beta
- Define q:\eq p\vert^\text{Im}_{V_\beta}:V_\beta\rightarrow U, so V_\beta\cong{}_q U[Note 2]
- Note that as it is a homeomorphism it is a bijection and as it is a bijection it is an injection, so:
- \forall a,b\in V_\beta[a\neq b\implies q(a)\neq q(b)][Note 3]
- So r_1\neq r_2\implies q(r_1)\neq q(r_2)
- But q(r_1)\eq p(r_1)\eq p(r_2)\eq q(r_2) (from above) - so q(r_1)\eq q(r_2)
- This is a contradiction, so we cannot have \beta\eq\gamma
- But q(r_1)\eq p(r_1)\eq p(r_2)\eq q(r_2) (from above) - so q(r_1)\eq q(r_2)
- Note that as it is a homeomorphism it is a bijection and as it is a bijection it is an injection, so:
- Thus \beta\neq\gamma
- Suppose that \beta\eq\gamma (and thus use V_\beta as the notation and discard \gamma)
- By the lemma and the property of the covering sheets (that they're pairwise disjoint) we see:
- V_\beta\cap V_\gamma\eq\emptyset (they're disjoint)
- Define q_\beta:\eq p\vert^\text{Im}_{V_\beta}:V_\beta\rightarrow U so that V_\beta\cong_{q_\beta} U
- Define q_\gamma:\eq p\vert^\text{Im}_{V_\gamma}:V_\gamma\rightarrow U so that V_\gamma\cong_{q_\gamma} U
- Now V_\beta\cong_{q_\beta} U {}_{q_\gamma}\cong V_\gamma
- Define W_\beta:\eq g^{-1}(V_\beta) - by continuity of g and the fact that V_\beta is open we see W_\beta\in\mathcal{K} , i.e. that W_\beta is open in Y
- Define W_\gamma:\eq h^{-1}(V_\gamma) - by continuity of h and the fact that V_\gamma is open we see W_\gamma\in\mathcal{K} , i.e. that W_\gamma is open in Y
- Note that t\in g^{-1}(r_1) and r_1\in V_\beta, so t\in W_\beta
- Note also that t\in h^{-1}(r_2) and r_2\in V_\gamma, so t\in W_\gamma
- Define W:\eq W_\beta\cap W_\alpha, as we're in a topology the intersection of (finitely) many open sets is again open, so we see W\in\mathcal{K} - i.e. W is open in Y.
- Notice that t\in W as for an intersection we see t\in W_\beta\cap W_\gamma\iff(t\in W_\beta\wedge t\in W_\gamma)
- --------------------------------------MARKER---------------------------------------
- Notice also that g(W)\subseteq V_\beta and h(W)\subseteq V_\gamma
- As V_\beta\cap V_\gamma\eq\emptyset we see h(W)\cap g(W)\eq\emptyset - TODO: Make a statement page with this, I've used it before!
- Because h(W)\cap g(W)\eq\emptyset they cannot agree anywhere, thus W\subseteq T
- Since W is open and contains t we have found an open neighbourhood contained within T for each point in T
- Because h(W)\cap g(W)\eq\emptyset they cannot agree anywhere, thus W\subseteq T
- Define W_\gamma:\eq h^{-1}(V_\gamma) - by continuity of h and the fact that V_\gamma is open we see W_\gamma\in\mathcal{K} , i.e. that W_\gamma is open in Y
- Define q_\gamma:\eq p\vert^\text{Im}_{V_\gamma}:V_\gamma\rightarrow U so that V_\gamma\cong_{q_\gamma} U
- Then:
- Note that z:\eq p(g(t))\eq f(t)\eq p(h(t))\eq: p(r_2) by h being a lifting, so we have
- Define z:\eq p(r_1):\eq p(g(t))\eq f(t) by g being a lifting, note z\in X
- Define r_2:\eq h(t), note r_2\in E
- Define r_1:\eq g(t), note r_1\in E
Notes
- Jump up ↑ TODO: Investigate
- Jump up ↑ This is what evenly covered means, each sheet of the covering is homeomorphic to U via the restriction onto its image of the covering map
- Jump up ↑ As the injection page describes, this is equivalent to and is sometimes given as the following form:
- \forall a,b\in V_\beta[q(a)\eq q(b)\implies a\eq b]